J
JeanLukPigheart
Guest
and you dodge my other question....
is that "consensus" that decides on the "standard" a majority of white, or non-white people?
You missed it, but I already answered your question.
The "consensus" is being reached by the MAJORITY OF THOSE WHO DECIDE ON A STANDARD.
It is irrelevant to the discussion at hand if law is "white" or "black", as it never represents a REAL majority of those REPRESENTED BY REPRESENTATIVES.
It is also irrelevant to the discussion if the PROCESS itself was DEMOCRATIC or not. Because it is NEVER democratic.
This sounds complicated, but it's not:
when 50% of the Americans vote, and of those, 50% vote for YOU, that doesn't mean that you represent 50% of Americans, but only 25% of them. Now decisions regarding laws will be made in the name of the remaining 75% as well, by the REPRESENTATIVES of the 25% minority that is.
But that doesn't mean that the REPRESENTATIVES of the 25% REALLY represent the "consensus" of those who voted for them (in fact, in the US, laws are FOR SALE).
Again, just because YOUR REPRESENTATIVES are racists, doesn't make YOU one. The parents and students in Texas can still voice their opinion by taking the power away from their representatives and decide DEMOCRATICALLY what THEIR consensus (information->facts->"common" knowledge) really is and how they want to be represented in said "consensus" (here, it is synonymous to "law of the land").
Hypothetically speaking:
When 90% of the Texan parents and students decide that Afro-Americans should be referred to as "apes" in biology books and Caucasians as the "super-race", that won't make it less racist or a scientific fact, but it will make it a "real democratic decision".
And while this will be the information out there then and become "common" knowledge, it won't make it a fact (read: true).
In short: the parents and students would have to vote and tell their representatives that they DO see Hip Hop as a major cultural force in the past 30 years and today. That wouldn't make it a fact.
Now what if 90% of them decide that Intelligent Design ergo Christian(ity)/ Theology is science AND that Hip Hop was a major cultural force? LOL
This is why in many cases, scientific facts should be at the core of education and NOT democratic decisions.