What the MV-8800 has that the MPC 5K doesn't

These threads are based off of facts. The fact is that OS 2.0 for the MPC 5K adds over two dozen new functions. However, this is an MV specifc thread (so I will leave the MPC talk in the right thread) and you guys can't come up with any reason for anyone to buy an MV with the exception they are dirt cheap because they are obsolete.

So it is obvious that you know very little about the MV or you just can't come up with anything that the MV does that the MPC 5K doesn
't. (the 5K does record 24 bit hard disk tracks and ts sampler does import any sample rate without conversion. The MV imports any sample rate but converts them to 44.1khz..FACTS).
 
jahrome said:
These threads are based off of facts. The fact is that OS 2.0 for the MPC 5K adds over two dozen new functions. However, this is an MV specifc thread (so I will leave the MPC talk in the right thread) and you guys can't come up with any reason for anyone to buy an MV with the exception they are dirt cheap because they are obsolete.

As said before I own both MPCs and MVs, the MPC5k included. I know what both machines can do, but in the end it's just stupid to even post threads like these. Why didn't you just make one thread anyways as this is CLEARLY about comparing the two, instead of 'separate' thread to compare them. It's stupid and you know it.

So it is obvious that you know very little about the MV or you just can't come up with anything that the MV does that the MPC 5K doesn't.

I am not even trying. Look through the threads. Why, you ask? Well, because I think it's stupid and futile.

You don't compare a Lamborghini and Ferrari claiming one of them isn't really a good car, it's just stupid. We all know both brands are very capable of making great cars, same is true for the Akai versus Roland thing.

Akai may have a bigger history making their samplers, but Roland is at least an equally respected brand, probably even more respected.

You're trying so hard to make your MPC5k look like something more than it really is.

I want to take no part in that, especially when you're not really interested in other products anyways. I mean, for real, you are wrong on so many accounts with a lot of your claims, it would be ridiculously foolish to even bother responding to each and every one of them.

(the 5K does record 24 bit hard disk tracks and ts sampler does import any sample rate without conversion. The MV imports any sample rate but converts them to 44.1khz..FACTS).

You are wrong here, the MPC5k does convert as well. The internal sampler really is 16bit only, ask Akai if you don't believe me.

Truth is, the MV and MPC actually have a lot more in common hardware-wise than you would ever want to admit. The MPC5k really isn't that much more advanced when you compare the two. To be honest, it's an extremely weak competitor coming from Akai, knowing the MV8000 was released a very long time ago and the MV hardly changed with the release of the 8800.
 
Bananasass - You make a very interesting point. The MPC-5000 is relatively young but still fails to eclipse a platform created 6 years ago even after replicating many of it's features.

BTW- not only does the MV handle any sample rate it also handles any bit depth.
What your seeing , if Jahrome is correct , is a lack processing power. That is , after all, a 2500 sampler at it's core. However the engine allows for 16bit audio with no processes in between that would indicate otherwise. If it there is I'd like to see actual documentation that proves it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I created this thread in an effort to stop MV users from spamming all the MPC 5000 threads. This was a place for MV users to tell all why they use the machine and what benefits that it offers over the MPC 5K. The truth is...it doesn't offer much and Roland had to drop the price.

Fact. The MV is not as respected as the MPC brand. You even have producers like 9th Wonder, Alchemist, and Havoc (of Mobb Deep) that are currently using the MPC 2500 and 5000.

Bananasass, if you actually owned the MPC 5000 and used it, you will know something as simple as what format it supports. Go back and re-read what I wrote. The MPC 5000 records 24 bit hard disk tracks. Its sampler can import numerous formats. Like the MV-8800, it will convert samples to 16 bit when loading. However, it doesn't covert sample rates. If you import a 48khz sample into the 5K, it will still be 48khz. The MV will convert this sample to 44.1khz. This is a fact. I don't need to ask anyone because I actually own and use the 5K. I don't know why Akai doesn't mention this in the specs. If you load samples at 48khz sample rate (or higher) into the 5K, save them to a CF card, and open them back up into an editor such as Wavelab, you will see that the sample rates were not converted. Facts.....Roland created a MPC-clone to tap into the MPC market. Akai makes MPCs for the MPC market and not the few people that buys MVs. The 5K is exactly what MPC users have been asking for..the MV..not so much. Truth be told, the MV was a weak response to the MPC 4000. And even the MPC 2500 is a better machine than the MV..and is in the same price range. When the 5K is not selling well, Akai will probably do the same thing as Roland, which is to drop the price and offer numerous rebates directly from the company.
 
bare bone necessities:

sampling: can u sample? can u loop the sample? reverse the sample? chop the sample? spread the sample across the buttons/pads?

sequencing: can u sequence other machines? can u "micro manage" and edit ur own sequence?

if the answer is yes, whats the prob? when are some of u guys gonna understand that alot of features is about numbers... when the RS7000 came out in 2001, it had a sequencer that could sequence about 360,000 notes... Roland followed up with the MC909 that had a sequencer for approx. 1.5 million notes!! wow!!! to the average person, that's crazy! but wait... the mpc 2000, and 3000 have no more than a 200,000 thousand note sequencer... and are STILL bein used 2day... my point is, the features and add ons are fine, and if it has what u need then get it... when i 1st looked at the 5000, i was one of the few that liked what it did, bcuz it has a few things the RS7000 has, albeit in MPC form... but even so, i want the keyboard setup on my machine, so until that happens, i'll stick with the RS... but dont let a Just Blaze or a Kanye change ur mind bout something... u still gotta get "hands on" and play with it... my RS has a 16 trk sequencer, the MPC has 64 trx... but ive never used more that 10 anyway, and im sure u guys are the same... for me, the MV and the MPC has plus's and minuses, u hafta check them both out and see what u can tolerate and what u cant... just remember, some numbers are just hype and some of the time useless.

da relic
 
Last edited:
slik da relic said:
for me, the MV and the MPC has plus's and minuses, u hafta check them both out and see what u can tolerate and what u cant... just remember, some numbers are just hype and some of the time useless.

da relic
I can agree with this pretty much. But when you actually list the "plus's" the MPC 5000 has 3x as more as the MV...and when you list the "minuses" the MV has more.

In terns of hype and useless functions...personally, I can't think of any function specific to the 5K that is hype or useless. But for the MV...pix jam is silly and its one buss multi-effects processor is over rated in these forums.
 
You couldn't even let a sensible comment through? Damn, talk about blinded by faith.

Fair enough troll trolls - but Slik said really sensible stuff and you still had to turn it into a 'my d+++ is bigger than your d+++' comparison. You have the mind of a three year old and the musical talent to match.

You would have to be the number one loser on the entire internet. Well done, gold star for your efforts. over and out.
 
VexaDJ said:
You couldn't even let a sensible comment through? Damn, talk about blinded by faith.

Fair enough troll trolls - but Slik said really sensible stuff and you still had to turn it into a 'my d+++ is bigger than your d+++' comparison. You have the mind of a three year old and the musical talent to match.

You would have to be the number one loser on the entire internet. Well done, gold star for your efforts. over and out.
This has nothing to do with the features that the MV has that the MPC doesn't.
 
VexaDJ said:
You couldn't even let a sensible comment through? Damn, talk about blinded by faith.

Fair enough troll trolls - but Slik said really sensible stuff and you still had to turn it into a 'my d+++ is bigger than your d+++' comparison. You have the mind of a three year old and the musical talent to match.

You would have to be the number one loser on the entire internet. Well done, gold star for your efforts. over and out.

+10000000000000000000000000000000000

WOW J I hope they are paying you very well
 
djkboogie said:
+10000000000000000000000000000000000

WOW J I hope they are paying you very well

Roland can't afford to pay its own employees (now ex-employee, Mike Acosta, the biggest supporter of the MV series) so they can't afford to pay. At no cost to Roland, I am telling people what the MV has that the MPC 5000 doesn't.
 
jahrome said:
Roland can't afford to pay its own employees (now ex-employee, Mike Acosta, the biggest supporter of the MV series) so they can't afford to pay. At no cost to Roland, I am telling people what the MV has that the MPC 5000 doesn't.

Roland is a bigger company than Akai, of course they can pay them.. apparently they don't feel there's a need for them anymore. Could mean all kinds of things really, but Roland going broke is definitely not one of them.
 
Bananasass said:
Roland is a bigger company than Akai, of course they can pay them.. apparently they don't feel there's a need for them anymore. Could mean all kinds of things really, but Roland going broke is definitely not one of them.

Yes, Roland is a much larger company than Akai. But you nor I know if they can pay their employees in these difficult economic times. The LA office was home to the biggest supporters of the MV. Now they don't need them or can't pay them? My best guess is like so many other companies, they are saving costs by laying off employees. They are also dropping the prices of the musical instruments that are not selling too well..like the MV and perhaps the Fantom G.
 
jahrome said:
They are also dropping the prices of the musical instruments that are not selling too well..like the MV and perhaps the Fantom G.


More rumor spreading.:rolleyes: The MV is actually doing quite well just like the Fantom G. However the same can't be said for the 5000. The street price is down to a measly $1800 brand new.

2.0 ,while a good update, didn't save the 5000 and it probably won't be around much longer. All things point to Akai trying to recoup it's investment and then moving on to midi controllers and the 1000/2500 models which still crush the 5000 in sales.
 
jahrome said:
Yes, Roland is a much larger company than Akai. But you nor I know if they can pay their employees in these difficult economic times. The LA office was home to the biggest supporters of the MV.

Knowing what Roland has been investing in lately, I have a pretty good hunch at what they can and can't afford. Needless to say R&D costs on some of their latest gear easily goes beyond what they've ever needed to pay for all their product specialists.

I'm guessing Roland might hire them again sometime in the future. But for now it's only proof that Roland still has good confidence in their current products, the MV line being one of them. They might be preparing the launch of a new MV, but I wouldn't think so, because they don't really have to. You've got to understand it's a niche market we are talking about compared to Roland's other gear.

I'm thinking Akai is the one in or close to trouble, hence their propaganda about mpc5k's OS 2.0.

Now they don't need them or can't pay them? My best guess is like so many other companies, they are saving costs by laying off employees. They are also dropping the prices of the musical instruments that are not selling too well..like the MV and perhaps the Fantom G.

Again you're spreading dumb lies. Roland did not drop prices on gear that sells bad. Sure, the rebate is there to encourage people to buy, but it's hardly something that Roland needs at the moment when it comes to getting good sales. As a basic law of economics it's a great idea to give a rebate whenever a product has an increase in sales going on. Roland just wants this to continue and ideally accelerate the flow of sales.

You don't need to be a genius to see they're earning good money by doing this and it's not like they're giving the MV away for free now either.

Really, in actual reality you're often so far off with your remarks of how the MV supposedly sells bad, lacks features, has bugs, lol it's stupid.
 
moyphee said:
More rumor spreading.:rolleyes: The MV is actually doing quite well just like the Fantom G. However the same can't be said for the 5000. The street price is down to a measly $1800 brand new.

2.0 ,while a good update, didn't save the 5000 and it probably won't be around much longer. All things point to Akai trying to recoup it's investment and then moving on to midi controllers and the 1000/2500 models which still crush the 5000 in sales.

Actually, the Fantom G is not doing that well. Chicken Systems Rep commented in the MPC Forum that several other workstations rank ahead of the the Fantom G.

The street price of all workstations are down. But Roland is knocking off $300 more of the already low street prices of their products. They are almost giving them away.

All things point to Akai remaining the leader of sampling drum machines/sequencers. Outside of these forums...professionals do not use MVs. This is a fact. They will always prefer MPCs. I don't care which model you choose but an MPC is essential.

Bananasass said:
Knowing what Roland has been investing in lately, I have a pretty good hunch at what they can and can't afford. Needless to say R&D costs on some of their latest gear easily goes beyond what they've ever needed to pay for all their product specialists.

I'm guessing Roland might hire them again sometime in the future. But for now it's only proof that Roland still has good confidence in their current products, the MV line being one of them. They might be preparing the launch of a new MV, but I wouldn't think so, because they don't really have to. You've got to understand it's a niche market we are talking about compared to Roland's other gear.

I'm thinking Akai is the one in or close to trouble, hence their propaganda about mpc5k's OS 2.0.



Again you're spreading dumb lies. Roland did not drop prices on gear that sells bad. Sure, the rebate is there to encourage people to buy, but it's hardly something that Roland needs at the moment when it comes to getting good sales. As a basic law of economics it's a great idea to give a rebate whenever a product has an increase in sales going on. Roland just wants this to continue and ideally accelerate the flow of sales.

You don't need to be a genius to see they're earning good money by doing this and it's not like they're giving the MV away for free now either.

Really, in actual reality you're often so far off with your remarks of how the MV supposedly sells bad, lacks features, has bugs, lol it's stupid.

You don't know squat about Roland. R&D? On what? Repackaged technology? Roland hasn'r released anything exciting in a long time. Yes, there was the Fantom G..but as soon as people got them home, they quickly realized that there are other equally good or better alternatives to a workstation.

There is no comfidence in the MV line. They closed the offices of the people that championed the MV in the first place. It is not like they were paying them much money anyway. The fact remains is that the price of the MV has dropped almost $1000. Roland is offering big rebates so they can help out the retailers..in an effort to prevent them from shipping them back to Roland. All the MVs expansions boards are discontinued/or being discontinued clearly thrusting in into the pro-sumer market. MVs are dirt cheap today.

What you fail to understand is that Akai has locked down this niche market. The MPC 5000 with OS 1 was already light years ahead of the MV. OS2 took this even further. You know for a fact that the MV can't come close to the MPC 5000. I don't know how well the MPC 5000 is selling. But as an actual user, I can tell you first hand that is the best MPC ever created..when it comes to power and workflow.
 
Last edited:
jahrome said:
Actually, the Fantom G is not doing that well. Chicken Systems Rep commented in the MPC Forum that several other workstations rank ahead of the the Fantom G.

Garthe !?! are you kiddin me ? Oh yeah , now there's an icon of integrity. One look at how he handles his business and his credibility is shot. Besides, Chicken Systems is just two guys in an tiny office half-assing things. After a year, the MVKC still doesn't work reliably.

The rest of post your typical lies and propaganda. 2.0 came ,went , and nobody even blinked an eye. No wonder the 5000 is being dumped by retailers for pennies.
 
jahrome said:
Actually, the Fantom G is not doing that well. Chicken Systems Rep commented in the MPC Forum that several other workstations rank ahead of the the Fantom G.

Chicken Systems Reps can say whatever he or she wants, but they ain't Roland.

I've heard from Roland reps themselves that they were glad their Fantoms and MVs are selling better than before. This is no joke or lie, in fact, go ahead and ask the Roland reps yourself.

All things point to Akai remaining the leader of sampling drum machines/sequencers. Outside of these forums...professionals do not use MVs. This is a fact. They will always prefer MPCs. I don't care which model you choose but an MPC is essential.

You're wrong and it's not essential at all. In fact, look at how many pros use the Miko and Neko and the huge amount of new producers that strictly use software with a midi controller. In fact, you should look at Akai's line-up, it makes perfect sense they've come with a midi controller for software now.


There is no comfidence in the MV line. They closed the offices of the people that championed the MV in the first place. It is not like they were paying them much money anyway. The fact remains is that the price of the MV has dropped almost $1000. Roland is offering big rebates so they can help out the retailers..in an effort to prevent them from shipping them back to Roland. All the MVs expansions boards are discontinued/or being discontinued clearly thrusting in into the pro-sumer market. MVs are dirt cheap today.

What is up with you... The MV did not have a price drop of 1000$ at all.

It still costs $1,995.99 at Guitar Center and you'll have to pay exactly that. Register the product and you'll receive $300 from Roland.

The MSRP of the MV, $2,899.00 has never been the actual price except for the very first year or so. It's silly to compare the current price to the MSRP.

The MPC 5000 has an MSRP of: $3,499.00 , and already it's being sold for $2,299.00 - $2,599.99. Sometimes even less.

It means two things. One the product never was worth $3,499.00 to customers and two sales are still going down not recovering from the very bad launch.

What you fail to understand is that Akai has locked down this niche market. The MPC 5000 with OS 1 was already light years ahead of the MV. OS2 took this even further. You know for a fact that the MV can't come close to the MPC 5000. I don't know how well the MPC 5000 is selling. But as an actual user, I can tell you first hand that is the best MPC ever created..when it comes to power and workflow.

This is a funny statement in a world where Akai has been losing ground for quite a few years already.

Best MPC.... you're wrong there as well. It's by far not the best MPC ever made.

Your claims about professionals not using the MV is wrong, you might call yourself a pro... but that doesn't mean the whole world uses MPCs. You don't know half how many people use software these days, let alone smaller samplers and drummachines.

The people that do use the bigger hardware samplers, I know for a fact that people dig the MV more than the MPC5000. I own multiple studios, I've got customers from all over the world basically and they do not look at the MPC5000 as something better. They see it's a sampler just like the MV is. In fact, many people prefer the oldest line of MPCs, not the 1000, 2500 or 5000.

You can't fool me with your promo BS about how great the MPC5k OS 1.0 was, because in reality it has been terrible for way too long. Swarms of bugs, damn!
 
@moypee
The guys at Chicken Systems have way more credibility than you in these forums. Please let forum members know where you can get any MPC for pennies. The MV-8800 sells for half the price of the MPC 5K. This is based upon the fact that the 5K had dozens of improvements over the MV with Version 1 OS and added several dozen more with OS2. You are correct that nobody blinked an eye in these forums filled with kids. The MPC 5000 is not for them. An MPC 500 and 2000XL are great places to start for them.

@Bananasass
Chicken Systems is a 3rd party that makes sample conversion software for samplers/workstations. Based upon their years in the business of developing these products, Roland workstations/samplers are at the bottom.

Roland Reps can say what ever they like. But the fact remains is that the MV has dropped its price over $1000 US and discontinued its options since the MPC 5000 was released last year. I am talking about actual street prices and not MSRPs. The Mvs price is about the same as the MPC 25000 (which is also a better machine than the MV). I would assume the MV would sell now that it is in the clearance bin. As far as the Fantom G, if you owned one as I do, you would know that the sampler is very weak and the should have probably just left it out. The sequence editing is also terrible. Visit the Fantom forum and you will see the complaints.

MPCs will always be essential and relevant, which is the reason why the Roland Corporate machine tried to shut down little Akai by copying the MPC. It didn’t work..an epic failure. In this niche market, professionals choose MPCs nearly 20 to 1. The many pro’s you talk about also use MPCs. Even open labs understands the value of MPCs because it also added an MPC interface to its new generation workstations. Look at their advertisements. They mention MPC and not MV. For the record, the MPC series has always been a MIDI controller that sequences external instruments as well as internal instruments. The MPC 5000 has 12 Q-link sliders/knobs to control external devices. Try hooking the MPC 5000 up to Reason 4. You can assign the Q-links to the various parameters of one of the Reason modules. You can program/control these instruments directly from the MPC. I expect future MPCs (there will be future MPCs..can’t say this for certain about the MV series) will capitalize on this even more.

The MPC 5000 is the best MPC ever made…hands down. But all MPCs are great tools. The MV is like “name your favorite DAW here”. But just like an MPC, you will eventually use Pro Tools.
 
Last edited:
You're so completely ignorant about what professional producers truly use.

Pro Tools really is only one of many great DAWs out there. Do you really think no one uses Steinberg's products or Sony's high end software? Pro Tools is great, but some pieces of gear simply work better with different DAWs and lots of cats have different preferences. Same goes for the MV. Personally I think people that really give the MV a chance will easily see how it's actually on par with if not better than Akai's latest MPC.

You're talking about the 2000XL as if it's crap. Do you really think you've got any credibility left after such remarks?
 
Last edited:
Please let forum members know where you can get any MPC for pennies.[quote/]
Brand new w/1 year warranty from authorized Akai retaler. $1850 delivered. They've been available for as low as $1700 from authorized retailers dumping their stock.
E-bay all day long

This is based upon the fact that the 5K had dozens of improvements...[quote/]

95% bug and function fixes listed as new features.

Try hooking the MPC 5000 up to Reason 4. You can assign the Q-links to the various parameters of one of the Reason modules. You can program/control these instruments directly from the MPC. [quote/]
Actually the MV can send any of the 127 CC messages via slider. You would know that had you actually owned he machine.

But just like an MPC, you will eventually use Pro Tools.[quote/]
...but because the 5000's problematic sequencer can't keep it's sync past 4 bars you won't be using them together anytime soon.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top