P
puffedoutproductions
Guest
Heezzi said:
He was supporting it when he was hosting it. He was apart of the problem.
Key word: WAS
Which makes any current change of heart/activisism all the MORE meaningful. Stop hating.
Heezzi said:
He was supporting it when he was hosting it. He was apart of the problem.
j-traxx said:
you're always trying to say something clever.
all the time. and you take the "L" everytime.
he already SAID he was a part of the problem.
you're trying to color him bitter instead of congratulate him for just flat out saying what needed to be said. cats like you are the reason that most cats dont speak out. because someone who enjoys the failure or "L taking" of others are so busy lambasting them for past involvement instead of paying attention to their current state of conciousness.
i hate that.
Heezzi said:
What are you going to do to fix the problem? AJ is doing talking about a problem that was obvious.
Talk ≠ Actions.
Cats like you? You don't know me well enough to even make a blanket statement like that. So if I was you, I would project your feelings on to those actually apply.
Yeah but it's bigger than "stripper music".Ganjabreadman45 said:So thats what happened to them?!?!!? Damn it took me like 8 months to find out what happened to them..... but seriously, AJ's right this strange phenomenon that is "stripper music" is taking over the country and turning our women and children against us.
SH*TS crazy man !!!
j-traxx said:
i said my peace. i'm accurate.
what is SO obvious that you are blind to is the FACT that his past involvement is what makes HIM saying these things hold that much more significance.
that's the value in his "talking"
the significance.
it's not a win lose situation.
it's not a "oh he's a crybaby" situation
and it's most certainly not a "lolz aj lost and he's acting out" situation.
Did I even said that? What did I say? Oh He's right. I knew I said that.. Reading is fundamental.
He's rightinstead of pointing out the significance of his statement for what it was you went ahead and added something you prolly thought was clever.
I responded however I felt like responding.. And? What? So responding with I felt like saying. I mentioned he was right.. I already knew what he was saying to be true.
It might have been an accurate statement but not towards me.. Next..like your use of the phrase "blanket statement" with me.
i was spot on. my "blanket statement" was accurate and thus maybe a bit too precise to be referred to as one.
I didn't know I had the power to judge him.everything that you are trying to hold him to "baggage wise" is something that he obviously addressed in his statement.
You don't know me well enough to even attempt that statement.. Blanket? Looks like one. Next.you going back to those issues is rather unnecessary and moot point and comes off as you belittling his current cause in order to lambast him for past involvement for what...
i dont know. maybe you like to do things like that.
it just seems a lil ... hateriffical to me. [/color]
Am I hating on him because he speaking out? No. I said he was right. I commented on the fact that some people are going to be less open to listening. Did I go into detail? No.
Dude stop being a hypocrite. If this was Swiss saying something, you would've commented on the fact that it was Swiss. So kindly STFU.
Ganjabreadman45 said:So thats what happened to them?!?!!? Damn it took me like 8 months to find out what happened to them..... but seriously, AJ's right this strange phenomenon that is "stripper music" is taking over the country and turning our women and children against us.
SH*TS crazy man !!!
That's excatly what I was saying. We all hate "stripper music", but it's just the tip of the iceberg. We can't blame everything on "Stripper Music"Heezzi said:
Not just stripper music.. Television is getting into the heads of youngins.
It's all brainwashing. I would said its being going on since '98 at least..
Heezzi said:
What exactly are you disagreeing with? I said he's right in the FIRST reply. Check. The statements he made are not what you are replying to so why are you even bringing them up?
He's right
I responded however I felt like responding.. And? What? So responding with I felt like saying. I mentioned he was right.. I already knew what he was saying to be true.
It might have been an accurate statement but not towards me.. Next..
I didn't know I had the power to judge him.
You don't know me well enough to even attempt that statement.. Blanket? Looks like one. Next.
Am I hating on him because he speaking out? No. I said he was right. I commented on the fact that some people are going to be less open to listening. Did I go into detail? No.
Dude stop being a hypocrite. If this was Swiss saying something, you would've commented on the fact that it was Swiss. So kindly STFU.
Heezzi said:He takes a L...
Dude cried about being off the show then says all of this... He's right but still takes the L.
J-heat said:And did AJ quit the show b/c he felt what he was doing was wrong or did he get fired and then spoke up about his views?
j-traxx said:
stfu?
wow.
ok.
this is what YOU posted
YOU STARTED the post depreciating his statement with your opening line.
trying to be clever?
you made expressions toward his sentimental crying to do what?
Depreciate what he said...
trying to be clever?
next you say he's right. BUT he takes a loss.
conjunction added to the next conjoining statement made to devalue what his sentiment was.
trying to be clever?
and failing horribly at it?
yea.
worthy of my "blanket statement?"
yeah. i hope it keeps you warm at night when the chills of ignorance nip at your subconcious.
the "L" taking comments arent things that you inject into your reply when you are support of his statement.
if you are truly blind to the semantics of your comments... then i'm sorry to have even brought them to light.
and towards your comment on me and swizz... we'll just have to WAIT until he gets on a soapbox and says something important wont we..
yeah.. you have no basis to call me a hypocrite because there's no precedent of swizz saying something important that i support and i lambasted him just for being him while supporting his statement.
so you cant call me a hypocrite on that note.
lastly if we are both intellegent adults taking opposed sides in an argument we dont have to get outright disrespectful just because we dont agree. we dont have to hate one another because we dont agree and we dont have to end friendships because we dont agree. i really didint appreciate that "stfu" comment you directed towards me.
i'm speaking respectfully and i expect the same... if you are intellegent enough to be capable of that.
j-traxx said:
stfu?
wow.
ok.
this is what YOU posted
YOU STARTED the post depreciating his statement with your opening line.
trying to be clever?
you made expressions toward his sentimental crying to do what?
Depreciate what he said...
trying to be clever?
next you say he's right. BUT he takes a loss.
conjunction added to the next conjoining statement made to devalue what his sentiment was.
trying to be clever?
and failing horribly at it?
yea.
worthy of my "blanket statement?"
yeah. i hope it keeps you warm at night when the chills of ignorance nip at your subconcious.
the "L" taking comments arent things that you inject into your reply when you are support of his statement.
if you are truly blind to the semantics of your comments... then i'm sorry to have even brought them to light.
and towards your comment on me and swizz... we'll just have to WAIT until he gets on a soapbox and says something important wont we..
yeah.. you have no basis to call me a hypocrite because there's no precedent of swizz saying something important that i support and i lambasted him just for being him while supporting his statement.
so you cant call me a hypocrite on that note.
lastly if we are both intellegent adults taking opposed sides in an argument we dont have to get outright disrespectful just because we dont agree. we dont have to hate one another because we dont agree and we dont have to end friendships because we dont agree. i really didint appreciate that "stfu" comment you directed towards me.
i'm speaking respectfully and i expect the same... if you are intellegent enough to be capable of that.
Do I GIVE a damn what you think about my comment? I typed what I felt like typing. AND WHAT?Wow.. trying to be clever?
and failing horribly at it?
yea.
You should have though about that before you attempted to insult my intelligence.lastly if we are both intellegent adults taking opposed sides in an argument we dont have to get outright disrespectful just because we dont agree.
we dont have to hate one another because we dont agree and we dont have to end friendships because we dont agree. i really didint appreciate that "stfu" comment you directed towards me.
Comments like above are the reason why I said "Kindly STFU".i'm speaking respectfully and i expect the same... if you are intellegent enough to be capable of that.
Heezzi said:
Hmm. Are you not the one writing essays about a two line statement over something silly?
Then go on to make blanket statements about my my state when you don't know me well enough to make judgement?
For what? to try show me up on a message board.
Do I GIVE a damn what you think about my comment? I typed what I felt like typing. AND WHAT?
You should have though about that before you attempted to insult my intelligence.
With blanket statements which are misdirected even after I corrected you, you continued talk on something that I agreed with AJ about from the jump.
You deserved it me saying that to you, because:
1) You are trying your hardest to "show me up".
2) You are having a hiss fit over a meaningless comment.
Comments like above are the reason why I said "Kindly STFU".