Stealing songs: Usher and justin beiber

Justin Bieber and his mentor, Usher, "clearly copied" the song "Somebody to Love" and its remix, two songwriters claim in a $10 million federal lawsuit.



Devin Copeland, professionally known as De Rico, and his song-writing collaborator, Mareio Overton, say Copeland first recorded the song on his album "My Story II" in 2008. A year earlier, a promoter had introduced them to scouts of (nonparty) Sangreel Media, who presented their copyrighted music to R&B singer Usher Raymond IV, the songwriters claim in Virginia Federal Court. In January 2009, Copeland teleconferenced with a Sangreel scout and "an individual who identified herself as Jonetta Patton, Usher's mother and on-again, off-again manager," the lawsuit states.

Patton allegedly told Copeland that she and Usher were interested in having Copeland re-record his "My Story II" album and tour with Usher that summer. "Sangreel never returned any of its copies of Copeland's "My Story II," and plaintiffs heard nothing further from Patton or any other representative of Usher," the songwriters say.


Patton and Usher then conspired with four songwriters -- Ray Romulus, Jonathan Yip and Jeremy Reeves, collectively known as the Stereotypes, and Heather Bright -- to "directly copy" Copeland and Overton's song "Somebody to Love" and pass it off as their own, according to the lawsuit. Usher allegedly recorded the song as a demo track, with the Stereotypes producing, and uploaded it to YouTube by or before February 2010. He ultimately decided not to use the track on his album, but brought the song to YouTube sensation Justin Bieber, who was recording his first full-length album at the time, according to the complaint. "Bieber agreed to record his infringing version of "Somebody to Love" with Usher performing the background vocals and the Stereotypes producing the song," the lawsuit states.

The song was a hit, and in April 2010 Usher released a remix with him singing lead vocals and Bieber performing backup. When Overton first heard Bieber's version of the song on the radio in 2010, according to the lawsuit, he "immediately contacted" Copeland and told him that the song "was clearly copied" from their version.


Their complaint lists more than a dozen "points of congruence" between the two works, including the same underlying beat pattern and "nearly identical opening lyrics." They say their song has not only been exploited through the sale of multiple albums and singles, but "is also being infringed by and through sheet music sales and live concert performances." Bieber performed the hit live on the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards and on the "Today" show, among other televised appearances, and has been performing it on his "Believe" tour, according to the lawsuit.


Copeland and Overton want Bieber, Usher, his mother, the Stereotypes and a slew of music companies to pay $10 million plus punitive damages for direct and vicarious copyright infringement. Remaining defendants are: songwriter Heather Bright, B-RHAKA Publishing, Please Enjoy the Music, Products of the Street, Sumphu, Universal Music Corp., The Island Def Jam Music Group, Stage Three Music, Sony/ATV Music Publishing, Bieber Time Publishing, WB Music Corporation, Universal Music Corporation and Universal Music Publishing Group.

Plaintiffs are represented by Duncan Byers of Norfolk, Va.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow. I wonder how that one will turn out. It really wouldn't surprise me if this happened, plus this sounds like it actually has some wheels behind it. Biebs and Usher might be paying up some money.
 
I'm not surprised... big name musicians and producers stealing and copying songs is
nothing new.

Copyright all your material before sending anything to anyone or even putting it online.
 
I'm not surprised... big name musicians and producers stealing and copying songs is
nothing new.

Copyright all your material before sending anything to anyone or even putting it online.
A lot of these A&R on twitter are doing the new hustle , but the same way. They are destroying the game, by asking producers to send them songs for so and so artists, and are stealing the songs and what we called in the 90's. "Flippin the Tracks"

So many naive producers and artists on twitter are falling for these A&R's on twitter. They never verify if these people are even who they claim.
Some of them are not verifying the writers on the tracks and later copyright lawsuits are coming to play. I am witnessing it more and more especially in HipHop
 
Last edited:
pretty stupid of usher to do when he had already met up with the guy. I'm guessing he had those producers recreate it but change it up to avoid problems. Could have changed the title though, lol. I wonder how much they sound alike. Robin Thicke lost that suit to Marvin Gaye's family when it was obviously different to anyone who knows music.
 
Robin Thicke lost that suit to Marvin Gaye's family when it was obviously different to anyone who knows music.

there was no loss - the family settled out of court with the label to ensure that no further frivolous suits were brought (the labels words) - the judge actually dismissed the case following the settlement and there was no finding of fact that there was ever a copyright infringement....
 
Back
Top