
ScorchinBeats
New member
![]()
Like this.
10/10. You got it!
![]()
Like this.
The problem with doing that to a beat is that most audiophile do something similar with their homesetup, and lots of "engineers(hence the quotes)do that to a finalized song after vocals are added...nomatter how many times I say it no one wants to hear it, BEATS AREN'T SUPPOSED TO SOUND LIKE FINALIZED SONGS.![]()
Like this.
The problem with doing that to a beat is that most audiophile do something similar with their homesetup, and lots of "engineers(hence the quotes)do that to a finalized song after vocals are added...nomatter how many times I say it no one wants to hear it, BEATS AREN'T SUPPOSED TO SOUND LIKE FINALIZED SONGS.
A program doesn't give you a finalized professional sound. Your knowhow does. It involves fixing problems that present themselves and capitalizing on sounds that can make you mix more "crisp". A trueengineer can do this in anything from Reason to FL to a Fostex Multitrack that takes cassette tapes. Knowhow>tools.
It takes like 10 minutes max to take a beat from "flat" to the quality to a finalized song...but that defeats the purpose of it being an unfinished peice of work. My question in return to the original one asked is how many JJ and Vybe beats are mixed to shyt after 3rd party vocals are added? Not knocking them, it isn't their fault people don't ask for the audio dry without all the dynamics and processing that makes it sound so "good' without vocals.
Typed from a phone. Sure my grammar sux.
^^^I was referring to heavy EQing in general. Audio is supposed to be left "flat" for the consumer to EQ to their liking. Instead we get producers who make over EQ'ed beats follower up by mixing engineers who over EQ finished tracks with vocals added. So that makes the beat over EQ'd to the second power by the time the song's done, lol.
I've sold plenty of "flat" and "quiet" beats btw. Plenty of overprocessed ones end up on albums because i wasn't contacted for the correct mix to record to but I wouldn't give you the track like that.
The problem with doing that to a beat is that most audiophile do something similar with their homesetup, and lots of "engineers(hence the quotes)do that to a finalized song after vocals are added...nomatter how many times I say it no one wants to hear it, BEATS AREN'T SUPPOSED TO SOUND LIKE FINALIZED SONGS.
A program doesn't give you a finalized professional sound. Your knowhow does. It involves fixing problems that present themselves and capitalizing on sounds that can make you mix more "crisp". A trueengineer can do this in anything from Reason to FL to a Fostex Multitrack that takes cassette tapes. Knowhow>tools.
It takes like 10 minutes max to take a beat from "flat" to the quality to a finalized song...but that defeats the purpose of it being an unfinished peice of work. My question in return to the original one asked is how many JJ and Vybe beats are mixed to shyt after 3rd party vocals are added? Not knocking them, it isn't their fault people don't ask for the audio dry without all the dynamics and processing that makes it sound so "good' without vocals.
Typed from a phone. Sure my grammar sux.
I was being sarcastic... lmao
![]()
I actually analyzed some of vybe's beats with IL Parametric EQ 2, and it doesn't look like he scooped out any mids. The above is just a snapshot of what his beat looks like with the plug in. In one beat, I found some similar instruments and played them, while analyzing them with the IL Parametric EQ2, and they produced the appropriate frequencies without any EQing of the mids necessary. There is more activity in the upper mid range than shown in my example (since this is exactly ONE POINT in the song), but in general, he does leave plenty of space for vocals.
The curve previously illustrated is more like a mastering curve to fix people's beats that have no "boom" to them and to clarify messy vocals. He probably applies EQ to individual instruments, but does NOT apply a curve like the previously illustrated one to the entire mix.
I took your comment seriously... And still stand by it. It really is what they do.
@ScorchinBeats, since it was only one point in time, it was pretty much impossible to get a screenshot with all parts of the spectrum being used. I didn't want to have to take a ton of screenshots, but I guess it can't be helped. Like I said, there is more activity in that range than my example showed. Here's another sample from the same song at a different instance. The only thing that's safe to say that he cuts on the master seems to be half way past the 10k section. All the beats I analyzed were cut at the same point with almost no activity past that point. To best understand what I'm talking about, you should analyze it yourself. It doesn't sound scooped at all; but it DOES sound crisp like the OP was saying.
![]()