T
Tha Wiizard
New member
Last edited:
- Status
DaNOC
New member
DaNOC
New member
You have no comprehension skills at all do you?
Wiz you are a funny guy, you leave tell everyone bye you love them then you come back post a long message about masons then you wanna try and come back? DUDE YOU CAN'T EVEN COMPREHEND YOURSELF ! THE JIG IS UP YOU'VE BEEN BUSTED!
Last edited:
T
Tha Wiizard
New member
DaNOC, you said that humans been here for millions of years right???? Deranged quoted you on page 38.
The oldest human fossil found (named Lucy and found in Ethiopia) has been back dated to between 3 and 3.6 million years ago. Lucy was not a Homo Sapien, but we do know that she was a hominid, she walked upright. Chances are our species are direct desendants of Lucy's species.
If you want to get specific, the first Homo Sapien walked the Earth around 200,000 years ago, but no one is really quite sure about that. The reason being that it is difficult to find fossils. The earliest Homo Sapien found to date is 200,000 years old but that's not to say a Homo Sapien could be found that dates back 400,000 years or longer!
Some will even claim that Homo Sapiens have only been on the Earth for about 100,000 years. If that's the case it is trtuly remarkable how far we have come in such a short time, well I guess if we've been here 200,000 years that's remarkable too. After all Dinosaurs were on the Earth for 250 million years, and what did they get done?
As you can see, you are clearly lying through your teeth to these people. Why?
The bible says that in the end times their will be a rapid advancement of mankind. We see that happening right now with all the new inventions and space travel. Wow, it took us over 200,000 years to get this far? Mind you that this advancement age just started around the late 1800s. According to the bible, we have reached this period so we now know the end is very near.
The oldest human fossil found (named Lucy and found in Ethiopia) has been back dated to between 3 and 3.6 million years ago. Lucy was not a Homo Sapien, but we do know that she was a hominid, she walked upright. Chances are our species are direct desendants of Lucy's species.
If you want to get specific, the first Homo Sapien walked the Earth around 200,000 years ago, but no one is really quite sure about that. The reason being that it is difficult to find fossils. The earliest Homo Sapien found to date is 200,000 years old but that's not to say a Homo Sapien could be found that dates back 400,000 years or longer!
Some will even claim that Homo Sapiens have only been on the Earth for about 100,000 years. If that's the case it is trtuly remarkable how far we have come in such a short time, well I guess if we've been here 200,000 years that's remarkable too. After all Dinosaurs were on the Earth for 250 million years, and what did they get done?
As you can see, you are clearly lying through your teeth to these people. Why?
The bible says that in the end times their will be a rapid advancement of mankind. We see that happening right now with all the new inventions and space travel. Wow, it took us over 200,000 years to get this far? Mind you that this advancement age just started around the late 1800s. According to the bible, we have reached this period so we now know the end is very near.
Last edited:
DaNOC
New member
Pryamids in asia
We were on the subject of Pyramids in Asia well here are a few and you can look them up. We were all over the world, not just one place as Europeans want people to think with a fabricated history!
One day if people like I will go over why they built the pyramids, it's a long journey, dealing with mathematics, Carbon, etc.
So as I said before we were all over the planet.
We were on the subject of Pyramids in Asia well here are a few and you can look them up. We were all over the world, not just one place as Europeans want people to think with a fabricated history!
One day if people like I will go over why they built the pyramids, it's a long journey, dealing with mathematics, Carbon, etc.
So as I said before we were all over the planet.
Smithgrind137
SATbeats.com
fucking lazy ass dinosaurs. probably just sat around smoking weed and watching Ellen and told their mom's they were out looking for a job
DaNOC
New member
Let me explain this again, The Bible as we know it TODAY is fixed by Maons! I gave you a Masonic Bible picture which I have in my possession, not from some Library, I HAVE THE BOOKS! What you think you're reading is prophecy, when the MASON READS THE BIBLE HE IS SEEING HIS CIPHERED CODES! It appears like it's a prediction, who you think rewrote the Bible? They made this bible that you see, they can do that! when you see in the Bible there were be advancement, they are telling each other NEW WORLD ORDER and push for new Advancement with the sciences they already stole. AGAIN IN AFRICA WE WERE ALREADY ADVANCE! There's advancement beyond this planet and before a bible was made! The embryonic Stages were said in the Qur'an 1,400 years ago! No Bible said that and they just got around to knowing that in the 1800 to 1900 hundreds ! GET THIS THROUGH YOUR HEAD WE WERE ALREADY ADVANCE. Didn't you see what another brother said? "THEY ARE BASICALLY MAKING US DUMMER"
DaNOC
New member
THE WIZARD SIZE]
LET ME SHOW YOU HOW ADVANCE YOUR BIBLE IS, IF YOU TRUST IT SO MUCH IN TALKING ABOUT ADVANCEMENT.
PAY CLOSE ATTENTION, IMA KEEP IT SHORT AND SIMPLE.
BIBLE:
KJV
Lev 11:20
All fowls that creep, going upon [all] four, [shall be] an abomination unto you.
Lev 11:21
Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon [all] four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth;
Lev 11:23
But all [other] flying creeping things, which have four feet, [shall be] an abomination unto you.
NIV + RSV-1952+ RSV-1972+ARABIC BIBLE NIV+NASB say this.
11:20
" 'All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you.
11:21
There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground.
11:23
But all other winged creatures that have four legs you are to detest.
Now, both versions of the Bible are wrong! No Fowl nor Insect has FOUR LEGS OR FEET! I was a major in entomology! So I know my ish! Ants were my big thing! Now!
How can you trust a book that suppose to be of God who created everything, not know how many feet he created on his creatures! YOU GOTTA EXPLAIN THAT TO ME!OH BEFORE YOU GO ON A TIRADE PROOF!
This is considered as a domestic Fowl! it has only two feet and legs!
There isn't an insect on earth with less than six legs! Six and better!
There isn't a flying wing creature with four legs or feet either, not a hawk, Falcon, Owl NOTHING!
The Bible is scientically not sound!
Before you make a move here is the Bible it's self
Now I know dang on well, a fowl is TOTALLY different from an insect. ask yourself why in two Bibles the same verses but two different creatures i.e. FOWLS & INSECTS! You have to explain to me that.
LET ME SHOW YOU HOW ADVANCE YOUR BIBLE IS, IF YOU TRUST IT SO MUCH IN TALKING ABOUT ADVANCEMENT.
PAY CLOSE ATTENTION, IMA KEEP IT SHORT AND SIMPLE.
BIBLE:
KJV
Lev 11:20
All fowls that creep, going upon [all] four, [shall be] an abomination unto you.
Lev 11:21
Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon [all] four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth;
Lev 11:23
But all [other] flying creeping things, which have four feet, [shall be] an abomination unto you.
NIV + RSV-1952+ RSV-1972+ARABIC BIBLE NIV+NASB say this.
11:20
" 'All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you.
11:21
There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground.
11:23
But all other winged creatures that have four legs you are to detest.
Now, both versions of the Bible are wrong! No Fowl nor Insect has FOUR LEGS OR FEET! I was a major in entomology! So I know my ish! Ants were my big thing! Now!
How can you trust a book that suppose to be of God who created everything, not know how many feet he created on his creatures! YOU GOTTA EXPLAIN THAT TO ME!OH BEFORE YOU GO ON A TIRADE PROOF!
This is considered as a domestic Fowl! it has only two feet and legs!
There isn't an insect on earth with less than six legs! Six and better!
There isn't a flying wing creature with four legs or feet either, not a hawk, Falcon, Owl NOTHING!
The Bible is scientically not sound!
Before you make a move here is the Bible it's self
Now I know dang on well, a fowl is TOTALLY different from an insect. ask yourself why in two Bibles the same verses but two different creatures i.e. FOWLS & INSECTS! You have to explain to me that.
Last edited:
T
Tha Wiizard
New member
Within 100 years, we went from riding horses to landing on the moon. That is an amazingly short period for such an advancement of technology. The other 199,900 years we pretty much accomplished nothing. Read below:
And Knowledge and Travel Shall Increase . . .
Another remarkable prophecy from the book of Daniel . . .
"But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book
until the time of the end,
many shall run to and fro [world travel will increase dramatically]
and knowledge shall increase."
(Daniel 12:4)
Daniel the prophet (book of Daniel) received some of the most sweeping prophecies found in the Bible. Prophecies found in the book of Daniel take us from the days of the Babylonian captivity (which Daniel was part of) to the very end of this age . . .
It is fascinating to see how God told Daniel, after giving him some of the most remarkable prophecies found in the Bible, to "shut up the words and seal the book, until the time of the end" and then gives Daniel two signs that would help us identify "the time of the end . . . "
#1. The ability to travel from one place to another would be unlike anything seen before in history.
(It is interesting to note that from the time Daniel wrote this book until almost the 20th century, the speed that man could travel remained fairly constant ... limited to the speed of foot, horse, and boat.)
#2. And knowledge would increase at a rate ... and to a point ... unlike any time in history.
(It is interesting to note how many reports and articles now brag how the sum total of man's knowledge is now doubling at a rate unlike anything ever found in the history of mankind . . .
Have a hard time believing in God? Just watch the news. The above verses are clear ...
Why? God is warning us . . .
The Kingdom of Heaven is available to every man, woman, boy, and girl in this world. It is freely offered to any and all who will receive it. Simply learn of Jesus, invite Him into your life as Lord, believe He died on the Cross for all of your sins and rose from the grave (proving there is life in Heaven). Learn of Him and believe in Him . . . for He was the only one who has ever loved you enough to substitute Himself for you on the Cross. He suffered and died on the Cross to save you from the torments and darkness of Hell ... if you will accept it. That is why He is called Savior. If you sincerely believe these things and ask Jesus to come into your life and honestly try to stop doing those things God says are wrong, you will go to Heaven.
It's God's Promise!!!
The only unpardonable sin is to reject God's love and His free offer of life in Heaven by rejecting Jesus Christ, who stepped forth from Heaven ... not to condemn the sinner, but to save the sinner (from Hell) and who willingly and lovingly shed His blood on the Cross so we can be washed clean of all of our sins. The Bible also says there will be no peace in our lives until we make peace with God, through His Son, our Lord Jesus Christ. The Bible also says there will be no peace on Earth until Jesus Christ returns . . .
And Knowledge and Travel Shall Increase . . .
Another remarkable prophecy from the book of Daniel . . .
"But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book
until the time of the end,
many shall run to and fro [world travel will increase dramatically]
and knowledge shall increase."
(Daniel 12:4)
Daniel the prophet (book of Daniel) received some of the most sweeping prophecies found in the Bible. Prophecies found in the book of Daniel take us from the days of the Babylonian captivity (which Daniel was part of) to the very end of this age . . .
It is fascinating to see how God told Daniel, after giving him some of the most remarkable prophecies found in the Bible, to "shut up the words and seal the book, until the time of the end" and then gives Daniel two signs that would help us identify "the time of the end . . . "
#1. The ability to travel from one place to another would be unlike anything seen before in history.
(It is interesting to note that from the time Daniel wrote this book until almost the 20th century, the speed that man could travel remained fairly constant ... limited to the speed of foot, horse, and boat.)
#2. And knowledge would increase at a rate ... and to a point ... unlike any time in history.
(It is interesting to note how many reports and articles now brag how the sum total of man's knowledge is now doubling at a rate unlike anything ever found in the history of mankind . . .
Have a hard time believing in God? Just watch the news. The above verses are clear ...
Why? God is warning us . . .
The Kingdom of Heaven is available to every man, woman, boy, and girl in this world. It is freely offered to any and all who will receive it. Simply learn of Jesus, invite Him into your life as Lord, believe He died on the Cross for all of your sins and rose from the grave (proving there is life in Heaven). Learn of Him and believe in Him . . . for He was the only one who has ever loved you enough to substitute Himself for you on the Cross. He suffered and died on the Cross to save you from the torments and darkness of Hell ... if you will accept it. That is why He is called Savior. If you sincerely believe these things and ask Jesus to come into your life and honestly try to stop doing those things God says are wrong, you will go to Heaven.
It's God's Promise!!!
The only unpardonable sin is to reject God's love and His free offer of life in Heaven by rejecting Jesus Christ, who stepped forth from Heaven ... not to condemn the sinner, but to save the sinner (from Hell) and who willingly and lovingly shed His blood on the Cross so we can be washed clean of all of our sins. The Bible also says there will be no peace in our lives until we make peace with God, through His Son, our Lord Jesus Christ. The Bible also says there will be no peace on Earth until Jesus Christ returns . . .
C
California
Guest
actually He never said the world would be destroyed. the promise was not to flood the world again. Back to IRL mode
DaNOC
New member
Ok I will give you that, ok, what about THE OTHER VERSES! YOU DIDNT ANSWER THOSE I SEE.
Isk2009
DamnSonWhere'dYaFindThis?
Heh, I figured this would all be settled by tha time I logged back on... I lose.
T
Tha Wiizard
New member
The word "fowl" is a mis-translation. It was translated from the word owph meaning "winged insect", LOL. The birds wings were counted as legs in biblical times.
The reference to "fowl" is thought by some Skeptics to refer to birds, but the word used here is 'owph, which merely means a creature with wings -- it is the same word used in verse 21 (flying). The reference in both cases is to insects. Now we might call this a poetic phrase (i.e., "crawling around on all fours"), and this is partially right. But there is an even better - and more correct - answer.
Quite simply, the big back legs on the locust, etc. were not counted as "legs" in the same sense as the other legs. Let's use an illustration from George Orwell's Animal Farm. In this story, Snowball the pig invented the slogan, "Four legs good, two legs bad" so as to exclude humans from Animal Farm society. The geese and other fowl objected, because they had only two legs. Snowball explained (more clearly in the book than in the movie) that in animal terms, the birds' wings counted as legs because they were limbs of propulsion, not manipulation, as a human's arms and hands were.
Now note the differentiation in Leviticus above -- referring to "legs above the feet" for leaping. The "feet" are being differentiated from the "legs above the feet" because of their difference in function. They are legs, but in a different sense than the "four" legs which are just called "feet." We are being told of two types of legs: The "on all four" legs (which are nowhere called legs; they are only called "feet" [v. 23]), and the "leaping legs."
It is clear that the Hebrews regarded the two large, hopping hindlimbs of the locust and the other insects of the same type, which are the only types of insects mentioned here (we now translate "beetle" as "cricket"), as something different than the other four limbs - perhaps because they were used primarily for vertical propulsion, whereas the other limbs were for scurrying around. Shifts of terminology like this happen even today; check this proposal to redefine "planet". A helpful reader also noted a similar issue with the "legs" of the octopus; see here.)
Unacceptable? The alternative is to say that the Hebrews - who ate these things raw - didn't see that these bugs had six legs.
Objection: Such insects are sometimes hard to find, and some cannot be found for up to decades at a time. So it's possible they did make such a mistake.
Not all such insects disappeared entirely for any length of time, and the author of Leviticus, by virtue of his literacy, clearly within the context of the ancient world had to be someone with a few years under his belt. There is no way it can be claimed that he happened to live in a timeframe when there were never and insects of this type around, or no one who knew better.
I did a little private survey and found out that a few people, even intelligent ones, did not know that insects had six legs. All this really shows is that people aren't getting a decent science education...not that this is relevant anyway, since it is doubtful that any of them ate insects as part of their regular diet and had them constantly in their face as the Hebrews did.
What other "winged insects with four feet" (11:23) could there be?
The last pair of legs of many winged insects are specially designed for jumping or "lifting off" and therefore serve a differing function than the other four legs. With millions of species of insects in the world it seems rather presumptuous to try to select just a few and claim that these make a hash of Lev. 11:23. But let's just take one as an example.
Here there is a site on the anatomy of the honeybee. The picture shows clearly enough that the rear legs present an entirely different orientation than the other four. More technically, they serve a different function and have a different structure:
Lev. 11:20-3 All fowls that creep, going upon all four, shall be an abomination unto you. Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth; even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind. But all other flying creeping things, which have four feet, shall be an abomination unto you.
Is this an error -- since insects have six feet, not four, and since "fowl" have two feet, not four?
The reference to "fowl" is thought by some Skeptics to refer to birds, but the word used here is 'owph, which merely means a creature with wings -- it is the same word used in verse 21 (flying). The reference in both cases is to insects. Now we might call this a poetic phrase (i.e., "crawling around on all fours"), and this is partially right. But there is an even better - and more correct - answer.
Quite simply, the big back legs on the locust, etc. were not counted as "legs" in the same sense as the other legs. Let's use an illustration from George Orwell's Animal Farm. In this story, Snowball the pig invented the slogan, "Four legs good, two legs bad" so as to exclude humans from Animal Farm society. The geese and other fowl objected, because they had only two legs. Snowball explained (more clearly in the book than in the movie) that in animal terms, the birds' wings counted as legs because they were limbs of propulsion, not manipulation, as a human's arms and hands were.
Now note the differentiation in Leviticus above -- referring to "legs above the feet" for leaping. The "feet" are being differentiated from the "legs above the feet" because of their difference in function. They are legs, but in a different sense than the "four" legs which are just called "feet." We are being told of two types of legs: The "on all four" legs (which are nowhere called legs; they are only called "feet" [v. 23]), and the "leaping legs."
It is clear that the Hebrews regarded the two large, hopping hindlimbs of the locust and the other insects of the same type, which are the only types of insects mentioned here (we now translate "beetle" as "cricket"), as something different than the other four limbs - perhaps because they were used primarily for vertical propulsion, whereas the other limbs were for scurrying around. Shifts of terminology like this happen even today; check this proposal to redefine "planet". A helpful reader also noted a similar issue with the "legs" of the octopus; see here.)
Unacceptable? The alternative is to say that the Hebrews - who ate these things raw - didn't see that these bugs had six legs.
Objection: Such insects are sometimes hard to find, and some cannot be found for up to decades at a time. So it's possible they did make such a mistake.
Not all such insects disappeared entirely for any length of time, and the author of Leviticus, by virtue of his literacy, clearly within the context of the ancient world had to be someone with a few years under his belt. There is no way it can be claimed that he happened to live in a timeframe when there were never and insects of this type around, or no one who knew better.
I did a little private survey and found out that a few people, even intelligent ones, did not know that insects had six legs. All this really shows is that people aren't getting a decent science education...not that this is relevant anyway, since it is doubtful that any of them ate insects as part of their regular diet and had them constantly in their face as the Hebrews did.
What other "winged insects with four feet" (11:23) could there be?
The last pair of legs of many winged insects are specially designed for jumping or "lifting off" and therefore serve a differing function than the other four legs. With millions of species of insects in the world it seems rather presumptuous to try to select just a few and claim that these make a hash of Lev. 11:23. But let's just take one as an example.
Here there is a site on the anatomy of the honeybee. The picture shows clearly enough that the rear legs present an entirely different orientation than the other four. More technically, they serve a different function and have a different structure:
[T]he hind legs differ from the other legs in their larger size and broad flattened form. These legs differ in size in the queen, worker & drone. It is only the worker that collects pollen and places it in the pollen baskets on these hind legs. The legs have long curved hairs. The space enclosed by these hairs is called the pollen basket. The worker bees carry pollen to the hive storing in these conclave shaped hind legs. The pollen is collected from the body by the front and middle legs and deposited on the large flat brushes on the inner surfaces of the hind legs. Each of which is covered by 10 transverse rows of stiff spines projecting backwards.
Although these legs are used to walk (even as the grasshopper's can be and are), in function and appearance they are clearly, vastly different. The Hebrews were just as able (and by extension of the same scheme used with grasshoppers, katydids, etc) to regard the back legs of other types of flying insects as being of a different order, of being something different, so that only the first four were called plain old "feet" as only the first four on the hoppers, etc. were called feet, while the others were given a differing name such as "legs above their feet". -JPH
Last edited:
DaNOC
New member
Bro I don't know but I am in peace, ummmm were't you floating in the air and all types of stuff until your family ........ you know the story. DUDE THERE ARE PEOPLE LIVING IN PEACE THOSE THAT BELIEVE IN THE CORRECT KNOWLEDGE EVEN!
Do you think if you were to die right now and called "JESUS JESUS" HE WOULD COMING RUNNING? He wouldn't recognize that name because THAT'S NOT HIS NAME! if you called me john do you think I would answer? No!
See what you read in Daniel about SHUTTING THE BOOK UP, was basically "KEEP THE KNOWLEDGE A SECRET" See I told you, you are reading from a worldly view and it's in masonic code, I told you. I have been through this in the 90's . But let me say this, you keep believing that, and keep going. I believe in Isa ibn Maryum = Yeshu'a Son of Mary!
Peace.
DaNOC
New member
Dude your kiddin me right? MISTRANSLATION HUH? LOL Those are not really legs on that cockroach, they are spurs. Cockroach don't leap either they crawl!
Lev 11:23
But all [other] flying creeping things, which have FOUR FEET, [shall be] an abomination unto you. <-------- DID YOU PAY ATTETION TO THAT?
Yo you tell me what flying creeping thing has FOUR FEET! SHOW ME A PIC OF ANYTHING IN THIS WORLD THAT FLIES AND HAS FOUR FEET! ONE PICTURE AND I WILL SHUT UP!
T
Tha Wiizard
New member
It is peace or pride.
peace (p
n. 1. The absence of war or other hostilities.
2. An agreement or a treaty to end hostilities.
3. Freedom from quarrels and disagreement; harmonious relations: roommates living in peace with each other.
4. Public security and order: was arrested for disturbing the peace.
5. Inner contentment; serenity: peace of mind.
interj. Used as a greeting or farewell, and as a request for silence.
Idioms:
at peace 1. In a state of tranquillity; serene: She is at peace with herself and her friends.
2. Free from strife: Everyone wants to live in a world at peace.
keep/hold (one's) peace To be silent.
keep the peace To maintain or observe law and order: officers who were sworn to keep the peace
pride (pr
2. Pleasure or satisfaction taken in an achievement, possession, or association: parental pride.
3. Arrogant or disdainful conduct or treatment; haughtiness.
4. a. A cause or source of pleasure or satisfaction; the best of a group or class: These soldiers were their country's pride.
b. The most successful or thriving condition; prime: the pride of youth.
5. An excessively high opinion of oneself; conceit.
6. Mettle or spirit in horses.
7. A company of lions. See Synonyms at flock1.
8. A flamboyant or impressive group: a pride of acrobats.
tr.v. prid·ed, prid·ing, prides
S
Speaker-Head
Guest
This is going on WAY too long. Honestly, this thread is going to have the most posts than ANY other thread on FP in 5 days. It's kinda sad....
Carry on...
Carry on...
DaNOC
New member
The word "fowl" is a mis-translation. It was translated from the word owph meaning "winged insect", LOL. The birds wings were counted as legs in biblical times.
-JPH
WHOEVER JPH IS IS WRONG AS HEEZY! Do your own research don't copy and paste someone else work!
Now, you are telling me the people of the OLD BIBLICAL time counted wings as legs? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE TELLING ME? AND YOU HAVE THE NERVE TO LAUGH? Dude wherever you got this info from, it's crazy.
Now I am not going to diss those of the past, because they couldn't have thought wings were legs, wtf! If you believe that you must believe in Unicorns too huh?
Num 23:22 KJV - God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn.
Num 24:8 KJV - God brought him forth out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn: he shall eat up the nations his enemies, and shall break their bones, and pierce [them] through with his arrows.
Job 39:9 KJV - Will the unicorn be willing to serve thee, or abide by thy crib?
This is your book talking like Unicorns are REAL LOL LOL you are a bugged out dude, see I am exposing you, to believe in things, hell I get blessed and experience the blessings of Allah and feel a blessed good high but never have I floated around the room as you said you did lol I DARE YOU TO TELL ME UNICORNS ARE REAL I DARE YOU!
BY THE WAY WHAT IS BIBLICAL TIMES, WE HAVE THAT NOW, SO YOU MUST MEAN OLD TIMES.
Last edited:
T
Tha Wiizard
New member
The meaning of the word Unicorn in the Bible did not mean a horse with a horn on its head. That is an image mankind and Satan manifested, notice the horn???? The horn on its head is a symbol of satan. It was a creature mankind made up. Read Below:
Some people claim the Bible is a book of fairy tales because it mentions unicorns. However, the biblical unicorn was a real animal, not an imaginary creature. The Bible refers to the unicorn in the context of familiar animals, such as peacocks, lambs, lions, bullocks, goats, donkeys, horses, dogs, eagles, and calves (Job 39:9–12.1) In Job 38–41, God reminded Job of the characteristics of a variety of impressive animals He had created, showing Job that God was far above man in power and strength.2
Job had to be familiar with the animals on God’s list for the illustration to be effective. God points out in Job 39:9–12 that the unicorn, “whose strength is great,” is useless for agricultural work, refusing to serve man or “harrow (plow) the valley.” This visual aid gave Job a glimpse of God’s greatness. An imaginary fantasy animal would have defeated the purpose of God’s illustration.
Modern readers have trouble with the Bible’s unicorns because we forget that a single-horned feature is not uncommon on God’s menu for animal design. (Consider the rhinoceros and narwhal.) The Bible describes unicorns skipping like calves (Psalm 29:6), traveling like bullocks, and bleeding when they die (Isaiah 34:7). The presence of a very strong horn on this powerful, independent-minded creature is intended to make readers think of strength.
The absence of a unicorn in the modern world should not cause us to doubt its past existence. (Think of the dodo bird. It does not exist today, but we do not doubt that it existed in the past.). Eighteenth century reports from southern Africa described rock drawings and eyewitness accounts of fierce, single-horned, equine-like animals. One such report describes “a single horn, directly in front, about as long as one’s arm, and at the base about as thick . . . . [It] had a sharp point; it was not attached to the bone of the forehead, but fixed only in the skin.”3
The elasmotherium, an extinct giant rhinoceros, provides another possibility for the unicorn’s identity. The elasmotherium’s 33-inch-long skull has a huge bony protuberance on the frontal bone consistent with the support structure for a massive horn.4 In fact, archaeologist Austen Henry Layard, in his 1849 book Nineveh and Its Remains, sketched a single-horned creature from an obelisk in company with two-horned bovine animals; he identified the single-horned animal as an Indian rhinoceros.5 The biblical unicorn could have been the elasmotherium.6
Assyrian archaeology provides one other possible solution to the unicorn identity crisis. The biblical unicorn could have been an aurochs (a kind of wild ox known to the Assyrians as rimu).7 The aurochs’s horns were very symmetrical and often appeared as one in profile, as can be seen on Ashurnasirpal II’s palace relief and Esarhaddon’s stone prism.8 Fighting rimu was a popular sport for Assyrian kings. On a broken obelisk, for instance, Tiglath-Pileser I boasted of slaying them in the Lebanon mountains.9
Extinct since about 1627, aurochs, Bos primigenius, were huge bovine creatures.10 Julius Caesar described them in his Gallic Wars as:
“a little below the elephant in size, and of the appearance, color, and shape of a bull. Their strength and speed are extraordinary; they spare neither man nor wild beast which they have espied . . . . Not even when taken very young can they be rendered familiar to men and tamed. The size, shape, and appearance of their horns differ much from the horns of our oxen. These they anxiously seek after, and bind at the tips with silver, and use as cups at their most sumptuous entertainments.”11
The aurochs’ highly prized horns would have been a symbol of great strength to the ancient Bible reader.One scholarly urge to identify the biblical unicorn with the Assyrian aurochs springs from a similarity between the Assyrian word rimu and the Hebrew word re’em. We must be very careful when dealing with anglicized transliterated words from languages that do not share the English alphabet and phonetic structure.12 However, similar words in Ugaritic and Akkadian (other languages of the ancient Middle East) as well as Aramaic mean “wild bull” or “buffalo,” and an Arabic cognate means “white antelope.”
However, the linguistics of the text cannot conclusively prove how many horns the biblical unicorn had. While modern translations typically translate re’em as “wild ox,” the King James Version (1611), Luther’s German Bible (1534), the Septuagint, and the Latin Vulgate translated this Hebrew word with words meaning “one-horned animal.” 13
The importance of the biblical unicorn is not so much its specific identity—much as we would like to know—but its reality. The Bible is clearly describing a real animal. The unicorn mentioned in the Bible was a powerful animal possessing one or two strong horns—not the fantasy animal that has been popularized in movies and books. Whatever it was, it is now likely extinct like many other animals. To think of the biblical unicorn as a fantasy animal is to demean God’s Word, which is true in every detail.
Next!!!
DaNOC
New member
IT'S PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR A HORSE TO GROW A HORN FROM IT'S HEAD! IT'S NOT A DEER!
WIZARD WROTE:
the biblical unicorn was a real animal, not an imaginary creature
Dictionary: u•ni•corn n.
1.
a. A fabled creature symbolic of virginity and usually represented as a horse with a single straight spiraled horn projecting from its forehead.
b. Heraldry. A representation of this beast, having a horse's body, a stag's legs, a lion's tail, and a straight spiraled horn growing from its forehead, especially employed as a supporter for the Royal Arms of Great Britain or of Scotland.
SO IT'S A FABLED CREATURE, WITH THE BODY OF HORSE, GOAT LEGS, A LIONS TAIL, AND A SPIRALED HORN GROWING FROM IT'S FOREHEAD?
Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: unicorn
Mythological animal resembling a white horse with a single horn on its forehead. The Unicorn was depicted in Mesopotamian art and was referred to in the ancient myths of India and China. Its earliest description in Greek literature dates from c. 400 BC and probably refers to the Indian rhinoceros. The unicorn was believed to be fierce and difficult to capture, but if a virgin were brought before it, it would lay its head in the virgin's lap. Its horn was thought to offer protection against poison. Medieval writers associated the unicorn with Jesus, and the hunt for the unicorn was often represented in medieval art.
Harry Potter Glossary: Unicorn
Creature
Unicorns are one horned white horse like animals that live in the Forbidden Forest. Their blood has magical properties that can keep a person alive, but at a cost.
Wikipedia: UnicornWikipedia: Unicorn
A unicorn (from Latin unus 'one' and cornu 'horn') is a mythological creature. Though the modern popular image of the unicorn is sometimes that of a horse differing only in the horn on its forehead, the traditional unicorn also has a billy-goat beard, a lion's tail, and cloven hooves—these distinguish it from a horse. Marianna Mayer has observed (The Unicorn and the Lake), "The unicorn is the only fabulous beast that does not seem to have been conceived out of human fears. In even the earliest references he is fierce yet good, selfless yet solitary, but always mysteriously beautiful. He could be captured only by unfair means, and his single horn was said to neutralize poison."
Mythology Dictionary: unicorn
A mythical animal resembling a small horse but with a long, straight horn growing out of its forehead. Often it was described as having the legs of a deer and the tail of a lion. Some sources claim it was visible only to virgins.
I can go on and on! Why is it that the Unicorn can only deal with a Virgin? hmmmmm yet this dude said they are real so how can he say that only virgins and get them lol hahahahah I guess the horn represent the penis being it's so close to her VAGINA=VIRGIN!
The composite features of this mythical animal, is from different animals, according to wikipedia and the mythical dictionary. It contains a beard like a billy goat, a lion's tail, horse body, legs of a stag, and cloven hooves. HOW CAN A UNICORN HAVE DIFFERENT PARTS FROM OTHER ANIMALS?
Wizard if you belive in Unicorns, show me evidence of one being found in a fossal document from a credible source and I will be quiet! They are no more real than the tooth fairy and Satans Claws SLIDING HIS FAT 450 lbs BEHIND DOWN A TWO INCH PIPE IN A NEW YORK CITY TENAMENT BUILDING TO GIVE ME PRESENTS!
I DON'T SEE THE WORD REAL UNICORN IN NOT ONE OF THOSE SOURCES!
Last edited:
- Status