jspadeofficial
New member
That's Bravery. Damn glad I'm not gay, that shit look F'd up. Most gays can't be gay by choice, why the hell would anyone wanna go thru that?
That ish better be a joke. The F is this world coming to?
There is nothing about the darkness of your skin that makes you more dangerous to society. Some people don't like very-dark-skin, but that's their personal hang up. Likewise, two adult men together are not particularly dangerous to society. Some people have religious problems, but again that's on them.
Though, I can see what you're saying. In a philosophical sense, it is ****ed up that non-pedophile gays get rights and liberation, but pedophiles (gay AND straight) are also "born that way" and yet no one wants to liberate them. But the key is that gays are not asking to do anything but be with each other, as adults. Frankly, whatever two adults want to do should be their business—gay rights or not.
But I guess that is the sense of morality some of us have that YOU don't see: children, animals—people and creatures that cannot consent—get special protection; that's the ONLY rule. Girl-on-girl? Sure. Guy-on-guy? You bet! Girl-on-guy-on-guy-on-girl? Why not! Maybe it's not "fair" to the pedophiles, but "liberating" them really will hurt people. Liberating gays will just offend people.
Edit: I thought about your point some more. You wouldn't tell someone who wears glasses that he has "deviant vision" and because SOME people are fully blind, HE has to be blind too. So why tell gay people that, because pedophiles can't have rights, they can't have rights too? Sexual deviance IS a disability, but like any disability there are different degrees. Is that fair? No. Life isn't fair...
Can't agree, because I don't know the name of it, but that would categorize you as "someone who targets and murders a specific group of people". Might as well put a swaztica(sp)on your arm. Categories are real. If you're allowed to do what you're saying, who's to say hilter didn't have the right? Who's to say people in other groups shouldn't be targeted? Someone out there just hates soccer moms, they get enough people with them and we got grenades flying into minivans full of kids on their way out for pizza after winning the game.we need self justice groups, a bunch of men with good protection, assault riffles and grenates, and find these mother****ers and execute them, all the openly pedophiles, all the extremist christians and republican radio hosts, just execute them and the problem is done, words are useless these days
Can't agree, because I don't know the name of it, but that would categorize you as "someone who targets and murders a specific group of people". Might as well put a swaztica(sp)on your arm. Categories are real. If you're allowed to do what you're saying, who's to say hilter didn't have the right? Who's to say people in other groups shouldn't be targeted? Someone out there just hates soccer moms, they get enough people with them and we got grenades flying into minivans full of kids on their way out for pizza after winning the game. I'm just cutting jokes now.
So if Race and sexual preference are the same "struggle" and are attacked by the same "ignorant people", the breaking down of differentials in sexual deviance is the equivalent of breaking down the differentials in Race and skin tone. Examples "hispanics are cool, but blacks should still be slaves" or "Light Skinned blacks are smart, but dark skinned ones are dumb" is the equivalent to saying "gays should be allowed to do what they want, but not pedos and dog f**kers".
But you can't tell me theoretically(morals have no place in this arguement)2 men have the right to be married, but a man shouldn't have the right to marry his cousin, or marry 2 women, or marry a dog that shows responsiveness and affection to him, or even LEGALLY date a 16 year old when he's 18-19. Hell, it's even worse when at the same time a 50 year old can legally date a 17 year old who's birthday is around the corner(actually, there i go with my morals again, in all fairness, that 17 year old is considered a "consenting adult" even though they haven't lived enough to be prepared to deal with a 50 year old that preys on CHILDREN).
All I'm saying is, you can't poke a straw through a dam because you want a quick sip of water unless you're prepared for the flood that comes behind it.
By your own logic and arguements, this scenario is the equivalent of saying all the light skinned blacks can go free, but the dark slinned ones stay. You made the playing field, how do you not abide by your rules to the game?
Semantics, let's just exchange "light/dark" for "white/black/hispanic/asian". now it's 4 to 4, WTF was your point? You want me to be "wrong' that bad? Waste of a post, no content of any worth whatsoever.My argument has 4 outcomes because a person can be a....
Heterosexual
Heterosexual pedophile
Homosexual
Homosexual pedophile
Your skin tone analogy has just 2 outcomes because a person can only be....
Free due to light skin
Not free due to dark skin
Skin tone is the determining factor in your analogy, whereas sexual orientation is not a determining factor as to whether or not a person is a pedophile, your comparison between skin tone and sexual deviancy is just as irrelevant as making a comparison between sexual orientation and pedophilia because sexual orientation is independent to whatever deviant sexual behavior occurs in addition to it.
@JeanLuke age of consent differs from country to country, so as fine as it is for an 18 year old to f**k a 40 year old in the US, you don't see a prob with a 40 year old f**kin a 12 year old in Pakistan? Yet by your own logic used in your prior post an 18 year old in the US is wrong to f**k with a 16 year old as well? All i'm doing is directing what you guys are saying beack at you.
I'm confused to the emphasis on animals too. I'd rather protect 12 year olds in any country than worry about some dog getting f**ked, a dog is food some places why to I care if my steak was sexually abused especially when it doesn't have the mindframe to be traumatized by the violation?
The point I've repeatedly made that you guys keep evading that the range of this discussion even proves is....WE ARE OPENING THEW DOOR FOR LOTS OF WIERD SHYT.
Y'all's arguements are on repeat rinse without understanding my debate is more supportive of theory than my own personal belief. You guys don't agree because of your personal beliefs.
Y'all keep pretending to be smart missing that on purpose.
The point I've repeatedly made that you guys keep evading that the range of this discussion even proves is....WE ARE OPENING THEW DOOR FOR LOTS OF WIERD SHYT.
Without the morals telling us a kid is too young, they think they love an adult and an adult thinks they love the kid, why not? Biologically they're more compatable than 2 grown men.
Y'all keep pretending to be smart missing that on purpose.
If people have been doing the exact same shit yall are debating about since the beginning of time, what makes it "weird"? It's taboo in our society, and we're a pretty oppressed, bias, judgmental, and hypocritical society. In a nutshell, we were brought up to be stupid.
That's the judgmental part I'm talking about. If we got rid of laws, that doesn't mean that we're all going to kill each other, start f--king all types of things, and doing bath salts.
Little kids won't start "loving" adults any more than they do now if we didn't have pedophile laws. There will still be folks who think it's disgusting along with folks who don't or just don't care and there will still be pedophiles and traumatized kids... sex laws are bull. They don't prevent anything. Pedophiles don't go "I'm not gonna try to f--k kids cuz it's illegal".
I disagree. I think the fear of God and/ or laws keep people from acting out. Remove the laws that will cause people to go to prison and more people are likely to act on the things they may be curious about. Remove God from a persons life and they can justify anything they want. Example...Simply remove the laws against smoking weed and watch how many more people try it for the first time in their lives.
I treat religtards the way they deserve to be treated, people with REAL, OWN opinions? I have no problems discussing that shit with them in a civil manner..........as you see in your case.
god and religion killed more people than anything else
If I couldn't go to jail for murder, I'd shoot people in the face for cutting me off in traffic. No law against theft? I'd just walk in the store and take shyt. True story.
I'm sure I'm not the only person with "morals" so f**ked up I think this way. Seems to me like logic get's thrown out the door to defend certain "lifestyles", but Rpalos that post....just dumb.
smh. Thanks to freedom and misunderstandings that lead to your opinion... you can "mentally think" that way. You have no "facts" that proves your "see through" points. You are just full of talk and blah blah blah. Tell a half truth to get people to believe a whole lie like I said before. I'm done with the gay topic. Keep that Jeebus thing going. Tell me more about these TRUTHS that you have spoken about. Let's go way off topic. All out with it. Let it all out. Make a thread about it. I want to hear more than the loops that you are stuck saying. It's entertaining.
Semantics, let's just exchange "light/dark" for "white/black/hispanic/asian". now it's 4 to 4, WTF was your point? You want me to be "wrong' that bad? Waste of a post, no content of any worth whatsoever.
Where is your proof? Not the misunderstanding but the proof.