F
FoulMouthFacts
New member
Other than using the compressor, what else is essential for achieving better quality? I mainly use adobe audition, have used cubase before but found adobe more user friendly.
Other than using the compressor, what else is essential for achieving better quality? I mainly use adobe audition, have used cubase before but found adobe more user friendly.
Other than using the compressor, what else is essential for achieving better quality? I mainly use adobe audition, have used cubase before but found adobe more user friendly.
Linking channels when compressing doesn't destroy the stereo width. Unlinking produces an out of control stereo image.Hey question, I've found that when I stick to raw sound that isn't compressed (I'm talking virtual synths here) I get a wide great sounding track that mixes extremely well. I used to compress the shit out of everything and it sounded ok but it was not wide AT ALL. So here's my question, based on my deductive reasoning skills, does compression cause sound to come out mono sounding if overdone? I know it's used to even out your peaks but I don't see why it would effect stereo width like that unless there is an aspect of compression that I completely over looked.
If the addition of the two kicks is above the threshold, one on the kick can be more affected by the gain reduction than the other depending of the compressor settings and the actual dynamic content of the kicks.Hello there,i have to ask something about "kicks".
I'm working with Reason and when i'm trying to put 2 kicks in the track one of the 2,sounds lower that it was at the first place.
It is something about their compression or i do something wrong?