Top 10 Reasons Why the Music Industry is Failing

Griffin Avid

Media Editor
Source: Top 10 Reasons Why the Music Industry is Failing

[h=1]Top 10 Reasons Why the Music Industry is Failing[/h]


4262292_f120.jpg





Introduction





You know what? I miss my vinyl records.
I miss going to the record store (a real community experience) and buying an LP for $10-$15. I miss the larger sleeves with the cover art and the inside liner notes which told you who wrote what and who played on which track.

The last time this reality was in full form was the late 80s (perhaps early 90s). And since that time a number of changes occurred which created the mess the music business is in today (most of it self inflicted).
So without further adieu, here follows the Top 10 Reasons why the Music Business is Failing from both the perspective of a fan and a singer/songwriter.




4262403_f120.jpg

They don't make them like him anymore! Ahmet Ertegun was known for his gift of discovering, developing and nurturing new talent.



[h=2]1. Record Labels Stopped Doing Their Job[/h]At some point along the way (late 70s) label executives became hipsters vs. real A&R agents, becoming more interested in keeping their jobs and playing it safe vs. finding authentic and original talent to nurture and promote over the long haul. We used to have an industry focused on finding the next new and amazing thing. Now we have an industry where labels copy other labels both in artists and material. Gone are the days of breaking out of the mold. For the last few decades it's been about formula. So it is then no wonder that radio has become a second tier medium that is mostly ignored in the United States (of course unless there's a game on).



4262376_f260.jpg





[h=2]2. The Record Labels Became Too Big[/h]Much like banks, record labels became too big to service the industry well. By becoming larger companies within ever larger umbrellas they became more beholden to their masters to execute quick profits or upticks in stock value which from the 90s on down to the present only led to a race to the bottom.




4262640_f260.jpg





[h=2]3. Lack of Talent and Personality[/h]Signed artists no longer have the staying power, personality or song writing abilities of their predecessors. They may be more marketable initially, but they're just not that talented. As such for the most part we don't remember many artists or "hit" songs from the last 20 years. I have to believe there are still amazing artists and song content out there, but some artists cling to the belief that they should write their own material when they clearly shouldn't. Others do come up with great songs but probably shouldn't be singing or performing them. Further, many song artists have failed to understand that music is a calling, a passion. You do it to do it. Yes you want to make a living, but fame and celebrity is the afterglow, not the inspiration.



4262727_f260.jpg

The Brill Building in New York City, which served as the launching pad for some of America's top songwriters and fueled the careers of so many of the Country's top artists



[h=2]4. Traditional Roles Have Disappeared[/h]The music business was once an industry where producers, songwriters and artists used to be siloed within their own core competencies. As such, there were clearly defined expectations and requirements that had to be met in order for someone to take on these titles. To our benefit, these lines got a bit blurred in the 50s & 60s. However since that time, with the dwindling of funds for music education in our public schools, we now have artists calling themselves songwriters with little knowledge of music theory, composition or song structure or appreciation for styles that came before (to our detriment). We also have people calling themselves producers with minimal studio experience and an extremely limited understanding of orchestration/arranging to better help an artist in realizing his or her full potential.



4262827_f260.jpg





[h=2]5. Fan Abuse[/h]Over the past 20 years the music industry has abused fans in the U.S with both unnecessarily high CD prices and obscenely high concert ticket prices. CDs cost pennies to manufacture yet cost the consumer upwards of $20 for a product that in most cases has delivered 1-2 decent tracks at best with the remainder serving only as filler. Concert tickets are also overpriced with all sorts of made up fees included in the ticket transaction to further pad the profits of the vendors who service this side of the industry. Frankly we live in an age where there are just too many other options available out there to entertain us that provide much more bang for the buck.



4262885_f260.jpg





[h=2]6. We Lost Some of the Old Experience[/h]Compact discs which deliver music via the WAV audio format have provided excellent listening quality since their wider introduction in the 80s but we lost something in this transition in respect to the full experience we had with records. The product became much smaller as did the print which makes it less likely that anyone is going to take the time to actually appreciate the album art or read the liner notes or credits. This, along with the cost and quality of content issues pervading the industry, has only served to further lessen the level of satisfaction the consumer feels after making a physical music purchase. No one contests the sparkling quality of digital offered via CDs, however you have to ask if it's so great why are the old vinyl shops still managing to survive? Answer: something about the experience is still missing. And the music industry (and electronics industry) have failed to address it.



4262985_f260.jpg





[h=2]7. MP3s Sound Horrible[/h]The MP3 format which made music truly portable also cheapened it by lessening the fidelity and hence the overall experience. Granted, we have reached a wonderful age where music can now fly thru the air and into our cellphones and music players. Further, we can literally carry a library of our favorite music in our back pocket to be made available anytime, anywhere "on tap". However, in its current format, MP3s sound tinny when listened to over an extended period of time. The format sounds even worse coming from most computers (MySpace's music player serves as a prime example of how absurdly degraded the sound can get). And so it's time to improve our delivery and storage systems in order to create the infrastructure to improve the digital audio format (either back to WAV or something better).




4263006_f120.jpg





[h=2]8. Too Many Choices and Not Enough Filters[/h]There are simply now too many outlets and too many touchpoints where everything is just noise and clutter. At the same time no one trustworthy is directing, filtering or grading all the music being created and trafficked out (with the exception of the better known music blogs whose share of voice is still relatively small). Radio stations used to fill this role for the most part followed by the staff at your local record shop. Unfortunately with the gobbling up of local, independent stations by the likes of companies such as Clear Channel, all we have now are generic, universal playlists. Further, potential music enthusiasts are no longer simply being hit with the current offerings of the majors with their traditional marketing tactics. They are also being barraged daily by bands/artists and their management directly via social networking, email opt-in lists, etc. The fact that there is so much out there in the market is not necessarily the problem, however. The problem is that a lot of the good stuff is being missed entirely while a lot of garbage is being shoved down the throats of a consumer that as a result values music less and less, day by day. Put simply, we can't make sense of it all, so we turn a deaf ear. In short, we need better audience targeting and filtering tools.



4263142_f260.jpg





[h=2]9. Lack of Musicianship[/h]There seems to be a serious lack of musicianship at play across so many of the song artists that are signed to major labels. It's become common knowledge that some of the most famous folks priding themselves on their singing ability rely way too heavily on auto-tune. There used to be a running joke about certain bands that made their living (and their hits) only playing 3 chords (nothing wrong with it - i.e. The Ramones). Yet now it really seems to have gone too far. Where are the virtuoso instrumentalists? Where are the guitar and drum heroes? The fact that we need video games to get our fix vs. seeing the real hero perform the real licks at a real show only further points to the fact that a deep seated need amongst music lovers is just not being served properly anymore.



4263213_f260.jpg





[h=2]10. Focus is on Beats over Melody[/h]Finally, the loss of melody has been a major contributor to the decline in music's standing in American culture. Traditionally, songs have comprised of four ingredients namely; melody, rhythm, harmony and lyric. Over the last 300-400 years, the strongest and most memorable music ever written more or less received equal weight in these four areas. Classical music saw heavier weight applied to melody and harmony. Then jazz, blues and later rock each applied rhythm to a greater extent (i.e. the rhythm section using drums, bass and guitar). This gave energy to the songs and to their performances both on the turntable and on the stage. However over the last 30+ years so much emphasis has been applied to beats vs. melody that the rhythm seems to be all we know. Problem is you can't hum or sing a beat. You need melody for that. And, unfortunately many of our modern producers only know how to address this need by lifting melodies from other people's songs. This can't last. With the proper permissions it's legal but is effectively cheating. And, in the opinion of this song artist only serves as the final nail in the coffin of an industry that has for far too long overstayed its welcome.



4268063_f120.jpg




Ramin Streets is a Singer/Songwriter and Entrepreneur from Chicago, IL
 
Very good article my man. I really liked reason 2 and 5. Record labels are indeed to big. They have created their own empires out of thin air, exploing the talent making more money than the musicians themselves....
 
Top 10 Reasons Why Independent Musicians are Suceeding thread coming soon...?

Here ya go...

1. Record Labels Stopped Doing Their Job

At some point along the way (late 70s) label executives became hipsters vs. real A&R agents, becoming more interested in keeping their jobs and playing it safe vs. finding authentic and original talent to nurture and promote over the long haul. We used to have an industry focused on finding the next new and amazing thing. Now we have an industry where labels copy other labels both in artists and material. Gone are the days of breaking out of the mold. For the last few decades it's been about formula. So it is then no wonder that radio has become a second tier medium that is mostly ignored in the United States (of course unless there's a game on).








2. The Record Labels Became Too Big

Much like banks, record labels became too big to service the industry well. By becoming larger companies within ever larger umbrellas they became more beholden to their masters to execute quick profits or upticks in stock value which from the 90s on down to the present only led to a race to the bottom.









3. Lack of Talent and Personality

Signed artists no longer have the staying power, personality or song writing abilities of their predecessors. They may be more marketable initially, but they're just not that talented. As such for the most part we don't remember many artists or "hit" songs from the last 20 years. I have to believe there are still amazing artists and song content out there, but some artists cling to the belief that they should write their own material when they clearly shouldn't. Others do come up with great songs but probably shouldn't be singing or performing them. Further, many song artists have failed to understand that music is a calling, a passion. You do it to do it. Yes you want to make a living, but fame and celebrity is the afterglow, not the inspiration.




The Brill Building in New York City, which served as the launching pad for some of America's top songwriters and fueled the careers of so many of the Country's top artists



4. Traditional Roles Have Disappeared

The music business was once an industry where producers, songwriters and artists used to be siloed within their own core competencies. As such, there were clearly defined expectations and requirements that had to be met in order for someone to take on these titles. To our benefit, these lines got a bit blurred in the 50s & 60s. However since that time, with the dwindling of funds for music education in our public schools, we now have artists calling themselves songwriters with little knowledge of music theory, composition or song structure or appreciation for styles that came before (to our detriment). We also have people calling themselves producers with minimal studio experience and an extremely limited understanding of orchestration/arranging to better help an artist in realizing his or her full potential.








5. Fan Abuse

Over the past 20 years the music industry has abused fans in the U.S with both unnecessarily high CD prices and obscenely high concert ticket prices. CDs cost pennies to manufacture yet cost the consumer upwards of $20 for a product that in most cases has delivered 1-2 decent tracks at best with the remainder serving only as filler. Concert tickets are also overpriced with all sorts of made up fees included in the ticket transaction to further pad the profits of the vendors who service this side of the industry. Frankly we live in an age where there are just too many other options available out there to entertain us that provide much more bang for the buck.








6. We Lost Some of the Old Experience

Compact discs which deliver music via the WAV audio format have provided excellent listening quality since their wider introduction in the 80s but we lost something in this transition in respect to the full experience we had with records. The product became much smaller as did the print which makes it less likely that anyone is going to take the time to actually appreciate the album art or read the liner notes or credits. This, along with the cost and quality of content issues pervading the industry, has only served to further lessen the level of satisfaction the consumer feels after making a physical music purchase. No one contests the sparkling quality of digital offered via CDs, however you have to ask if it's so great why are the old vinyl shops still managing to survive? Answer: something about the experience is still missing. And the music industry (and electronics industry) have failed to address it.








7. MP3s Sound Horrible

The MP3 format which made music truly portable also cheapened it by lessening the fidelity and hence the overall experience. Granted, we have reached a wonderful age where music can now fly thru the air and into our cellphones and music players. Further, we can literally carry a library of our favorite music in our back pocket to be made available anytime, anywhere "on tap". However, in its current format, MP3s sound tinny when listened to over an extended period of time. The format sounds even worse coming from most computers (MySpace's music player serves as a prime example of how absurdly degraded the sound can get). And so it's time to improve our delivery and storage systems in order to create the infrastructure to improve the digital audio format (either back to WAV or something better).









8. Too Many Choices and Not Enough Filters

There are simply now too many outlets and too many touchpoints where everything is just noise and clutter. At the same time no one trustworthy is directing, filtering or grading all the music being created and trafficked out (with the exception of the better known music blogs whose share of voice is still relatively small). Radio stations used to fill this role for the most part followed by the staff at your local record shop. Unfortunately with the gobbling up of local, independent stations by the likes of companies such as Clear Channel, all we have now are generic, universal playlists. Further, potential music enthusiasts are no longer simply being hit with the current offerings of the majors with their traditional marketing tactics. They are also being barraged daily by bands/artists and their management directly via social networking, email opt-in lists, etc. The fact that there is so much out there in the market is not necessarily the problem, however. The problem is that a lot of the good stuff is being missed entirely while a lot of garbage is being shoved down the throats of a consumer that as a result values music less and less, day by day. Put simply, we can't make sense of it all, so we turn a deaf ear. In short, we need better audience targeting and filtering tools.








9. Lack of Musicianship

There seems to be a serious lack of musicianship at play across so many of the song artists that are signed to major labels. It's become common knowledge that some of the most famous folks priding themselves on their singing ability rely way too heavily on auto-tune. There used to be a running joke about certain bands that made their living (and their hits) only playing 3 chords (nothing wrong with it - i.e. The Ramones). Yet now it really seems to have gone too far. Where are the virtuoso instrumentalists? Where are the guitar and drum heroes? The fact that we need video games to get our fix vs. seeing the real hero perform the real licks at a real show only further points to the fact that a deep seated need amongst music lovers is just not being served properly anymore.








10. Focus is on Beats over Melody

Finally, the loss of melody has been a major contributor to the decline in music's standing in American culture. Traditionally, songs have comprised of four ingredients namely; melody, rhythm, harmony and lyric. Over the last 300-400 years, the strongest and most memorable music ever written more or less received equal weight in these four areas. Classical music saw heavier weight applied to melody and harmony. Then jazz, blues and later rock each applied rhythm to a greater extent (i.e. the rhythm section using drums, bass and guitar). This gave energy to the songs and to their performances both on the turntable and on the stage. However over the last 30+ years so much emphasis has been applied to beats vs. melody that the rhythm seems to be all we know. Problem is you can't hum or sing a beat. You need melody for that. And, unfortunately many of our modern producers only know how to address this need by lifting melodies from other people's songs. This can't last. With the proper permissions it's legal but is effectively cheating. And, in the opinion of this song artist only serves as the final nail in the coffin of an industry that has for far too long overstayed its welcome.
 
How can you state that the industry is changing, when it is clearly obvious to see the stagnation from the past 4-5 years at least? Stagnation meaning not that new music isn't being produced, but it is very difficult to separate one song from the next. Note, I am not only referring to hip-hop/rap, but also to country, pop, and even alternative in some respects.

Change isn't about making a mold for the next 10 songs, only to throw them in the garbage in two weeks. I would actually call that desperation, and an obvious outcry to the lack of talent that is at the hull of our music industry- both the singers/songwriters, as well as the producers.
 
Last edited:
I'll agree with 1, 2, 4 and 5.


But the other ones sound like a bitter old man, shaking his fist saying "back in my day, we didn't have no stinking record player...we didn't have no stinking radio. We had to go see the band play LIVE. Radio sounds horrible, all that static".


Technology advances things. Not to say it always makes things BETTER, but it does make things DIFFERENT. Technology is gonna affect each generation differently, and the previous generation is always gonna vilify technology. Happens in every industry.


The main reasons that the music industry is failing is because they IGNORED their customers changing consumption habits, and they FOUGHT technology.


In ANY industry, if you fight the advancements of technology, you're going to eventually become extinct.
 
Most of America's established corporations are operating under an outdated business model, it's not just the music industry either. That means opportunities for visionaries who are able to adapt!!!
 
3 and 9 are LABEL problems.

They sign someone off hype, and then cut them when they find out they don't have "staying power" or "real talent".

Change happens. This industry has evolved multiple times through history. Still there, tho.
 
MP3's do sound shitty though. If you compare CD or Vinyl sound to an MP3 it blows it out the water.


And 720p looks better than 1080i. But most people's eyes don't know the difference.


And it all sounds the same when you're listening through shitty earbuds like most people are.
 
MP3's do sound shitty though. If you compare CD or Vinyl sound to an MP3 it blows it out the water.

You will hardly find anybody who is capable of hearing the difference between a 192kbps (and up) MP3 and a CD-quality recording.
In fact, most people don't even possess the audio equipment to hear that difference.
I can hear the difference between 256kbps and CD-quality...........yeah, in a fine-tuned studio room with world-class monitors.

Also "vinyl sound" is an oxymoron as well. Vinyl doesn't sound special BY ITSELF. It's not a digital format, so it will sound different on every system you play it back on. Same goes for transferring vinyl recordings to digital formats.

As far as "CD quality" goes: it sounds SHITTY compared to a 24bit/96kHz recording.
If you ever have the chance to, play back a SOLO ACOUSTIC GUITAR TRACK in 16bit/44.1kHz vs. one recorded and played back in 24bit/96kHz - day & night difference, even for inexperienced listeners.

As far as reducing data-transfers goes: today's PCs are capable of decoding DOZENS of FLAC or (lossless) OGG tracks in real-time.
And even services like iTunes or Beatport offer (sometimes!) high-quality downloads.

Should I download a 6MB MP3 or a 25MB FLAC-file, which is an exact copy of the "CD quality" recording? I got a 100MBit fiber-glass connection. I don't care. The horrible state of US-broadband services is the problem, not the MP3 format (which was a solution for times, when people with 384kB/s connections were "ballers" who could download MP3s in 128kbps quality in 15mins (Wooo!!!): but yo, Napster-times are over!). I can download that 25MB (lossless) FLAC song in roughly 2 seconds.
 
Have you listened to XM radio? Have you listened to Current Dj's using Serratto? They download shitty quality MP3's and play them all the time, you'll hear various quality depending on the song they are downloading. There is no quality control when people are DLing shit from the internet. If there was consistency then maybe, but there isn't any. As far as Vinyl I started Djing and it's my opinion that vinyl sounds better to me. This is on Technic 1200's with ShureM44 needles. Headphones going right into the mixer to hear the quality. I'm standing by my opinion.


You will hardly find anybody who is capable of hearing the difference between a 192kbps (and up) MP3 and a CD-quality recording.
In fact, most people don't even possess the audio equipment to hear that difference.
I can hear the difference between 256kbps and CD-quality...........yeah, in a fine-tuned studio room with world-class monitors.

Also "vinyl sound" is an oxymoron as well. Vinyl doesn't sound special BY ITSELF. It's not a digital format, so it will sound different on every system you play it back on. Same goes for transferring vinyl recordings to digital formats.

As far as "CD quality" goes: it sounds SHITTY compared to a 24bit/96kHz recording.
If you ever have the chance to, play back a SOLO ACOUSTIC GUITAR TRACK in 16bit/44.1kHz vs. one recorded and played back in 24bit/96kHz - day & night difference, even for inexperienced listeners.

As far as reducing data-transfers goes: today's PCs are capable of decoding DOZENS of FLAC or (lossless) OGG tracks in real-time.
And even services like iTunes or Beatport offer (sometimes!) high-quality downloads.

Should I download a 6MB MP3 or a 25MB FLAC-file, which is an exact copy of the "CD quality" recording? I got a 100MBit fiber-glass connection. I don't care. The horrible state of US-broadband services is the problem, not the MP3 format (which was a solution for times, when people with 384kB/s connections were "ballers" who could download MP3s in 128kbps quality in 15mins (Wooo!!!): but yo, Napster-times are over!). I can download that 25MB (lossless) FLAC song in roughly 2 seconds.
 
I can't agree with anything on that list or the idea the music industry is "failing". What should be recognized is that the industry is returning to a prior state...so if anything the question we should ask is why the industry was so lucrative at the end of the 90s and beginning of this millennium.

Another problem that we now face is that labels got used to making small investments for HUGE payouts...so how do we get them to go back to the days of barely getting most albums out of the red in order to get them into the hands of consumers. For every MC Hammer or Pearl Jam or Madonna...there were 20 Willa Ford's, Father MCs, E-X Girlfriends, Karyn Whites, Rehabs, 98 Degree'ses, LFOs, ect. You took alot more chances while waiting for the big payouts, now labels have gotten used to turning everything into a big payout and no longer wish to deal with the gamble.

I personally believe the current value of a dollar plays a part in all this. Most would rather pay their internet bill and get all their music for free than support an artist telling you he's rich and you are not. I still buy CDs and iTunes releases, so i don't know the answer...but do know sales don't look too far off from where they were in the mid 90s...just alot less albums get released now.

Fun Fact...Mary J Blige NEVER went platinum until "No Nore Drama(2001)"? Quit believing things are that bad, they're just back to normal.
 
Last edited:
Have you listened to XM radio? Have you listened to Current Dj's using Serratto? They download shitty quality MP3's and play them all the time, you'll hear various quality depending on the song they are downloading. There is no quality control when people are DLing shit from the internet. If there was consistency then maybe, but there isn't any. As far as Vinyl I started Djing and it's my opinion that vinyl sounds better to me. This is on Technic 1200's with ShureM44 needles. Headphones going right into the mixer to hear the quality. I'm standing by my opinion.



But here's the thing...



CONSUMERS DON'T CARE!!!!!



Only audio nerds like us enjoy arguing about the intricate details of high definition sound. Honestly, artists aren't making records FOR US. High end sound equipment companies are the ones targeting us, not the recording industry.


So none of that shit you're talking about matters when a person is buying a song. Because they are gonna do the majority of their listening on shitty ear buds anyway.



If you notice, Dre/Iovine BEATS BY DRE switched up their marketing angle of their products. First, they started off telling people "HEAR THE MUSIC THE WAY IT WAS INTENDED", and you had all of these marketing pieces about how the sound of music was being destroyed.




AND NOBODY CARED. Customers didn't care about that shit. Teenagers didn't care about that shit. The music buying public in general DIDN'T CARE ABOUT THAT SHIT.


So they switched up their marketing strategy, and positioned those headphones as a glorified fashion accessory. A status symbol....



AND THEM SHITS START SELLING OUT THE STORES.




Your thinking right there, is exactly why record labels started failing. Because they ignored what they ACTUALLY wanted, and started pushing onto the customer what they (the label) WANTED them to want.
 
Troup you're right and their equipment sucks. These are the people paying 200 for beats by dre head phones when you can pay half for a pair of Sony MDR's with superior quality. I'm just venting basically.
 
There's a formula here...I guess if you figure out the entire equation...you get rich.

I've gathered this much. A "good" album(Kendrick Lamar, Adele, Emelie Sande, Bruno Mars, One Direction, Lana Del Rey, Justin Timberlake)that catches consumers ears can still sell. So you you have "good albums" worth of material, go for it. A "good' single" will outsell a bad album while keeping the artist out the red(Baauer, PSY, Will I Am)no reason to even release the album, just get your single money. If you have neither a good album or single, you become FILLER.Filler is downloaded for free and the investment is the devices we put them on. iPads, iPhones, iPods, MP# players, and we gotta play them back thru those "beats by Dres".

"You have to do enough to make your music valuable." I was told all this by a big industry guy back in 93 or 94, funny it still holds truth, he just said "Pioneers and JVC Systems" instead of "iPods and Beats by Dres". "Bootlegged tape" instead of "downloaded".

Still the same game.
 
Last edited:
Music industry is about to start winning. If they control YOUR PHONE AS FAR AS MUSIC AND VIDEO...........get your lips ready for that ass again.

Said it before man.....youtube is about to be like "funniest home videos" in a few more years. Nobody will be there checking out music. Your mom and grandma and older sister will be there..........crying at beautiful wedding footage, aaaaaaaaaaawin at cute cats and dogs...........but music and videos will be occupied. Who needs a computer, right? When you got a quad core processor on your phone.....another necessary purchase in this destroyed U.S economy that is said was headed for HEELLLLLL!!!!!! They still going to have phone......even though $600 was spent on a new phone 8 months ago. Who needs a computer? Who need books to lose......when you got an tablet...which will be "if not already" a necessity?"

More people living with there retired parents. Or teaming up on the rent.......having swinger parties every weekend.....anything goes......dude goes both ways and all that.

More music catering people's right to do and be whatever the hell they want to be.


More people moving away from the big city into an extremely lower cost of living. Just to have these things.


The work around when shit gets bad. And that phone is the most important part of their life. Not mine because I'm old school. I haven't had a phone since 2009. lmao! You can't reach me unless I'm at home. But these impatient ass people today think something is wrong with me? Hell.....what happened to ONLY HAVING A HOME PHONE BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A MOBILE PHONE? I had one when nobody had one....I was the shit. Now I can do whatever the hell I want on just a phone. Including use it as my music player in the ride. So I don't want to talk to you......I just want to use the other stuff.

What are YOU going to do when you are only surrounded by people doing the same thing as you? I mean what is so special about you being number one on Reverbnation?

You should've and should be prepare for this mobile era. Instead you went for what was free.

Get your apps ready for WAR.....because the majors ain't playing with you. You ain't going to get a piece of the pie.....sorry.....it was only a matter of time before they found a way to KEEP YOU AWAY.

Time to regroup your thoughts. Free is over.

You haven't seen companies sue yet.....wait til next year or the year after.......NEW RULES WILL APPLY TO BE SAFE FROM THE MAJORS. Illuminati ain't got shit on the major...you will beg for the illuminati to make it stop!!!! Those Fema Camps are for you infringing on their SHIT, Got dammit!! Nothing else. They don't want your money....YOU AIN'T GONE HAVE NO MONEY. They want to hear you screeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmm....."NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.....NOOOOOOO MOOOOOOORE!!!"


Outro music please.......
 
Last edited:
Have you listened to XM radio? Have you listened to Current Dj's using Serratto? They download shitty quality MP3's and play them all the time, you'll hear various quality depending on the song they are downloading. There is no quality control when people are DLing shit from the internet. If there was consistency then maybe, but there isn't any. As far as Vinyl I started Djing and it's my opinion that vinyl sounds better to me. This is on Technic 1200's with ShureM44 needles. Headphones going right into the mixer to hear the quality. I'm standing by my opinion.

First off, read the posts you are replying to. I clearly said, that vinyl is NOT A DIGITAL FORMAT (meaning, not a LOSSLESS digital format like FLAC or (lossless) OGG), so the experience depends on the playback machine, needle, the quality of the vinyl, the quality of the pressing (!!!), the quality of the speakers, the quality of the room "tuning". How the hell will you disagree with that? ANY vinyl isn't by itself somehow "magic". A DIGITAL COPY of a recording DOES have the same quality, no matter what. There, only the D/As play a role and the speakers (.....room as well). :)

And I know many DJs don't even care about quality. XM Radio? Doesn't matter. FM radio used to /has "automatic" compression on the signal as well.
-10dB/5:1 ratio (!!!!!!!!!). FML. Otherwise you would get almost not stereo image. Like I said. I buy high-quality stuff and FLAC/APE/OGG releases, where/when possible.

If I get a soundtrack to a movie, I look if it's available in 24bit/96kHz, 'cause it's produced in that quality anyway (!!!) for it to be on DVD.
Same goes for soundtracks of TV shows (even though, there the most shit is down-sampled to 48kHz).
I want to hear that quality, because I don't wear earbuds (DON'T USE EARBUDS!!!! those things build up the pressure by directly pressing the air IN THE EAR against the hairs translating air vibrations in your ear into audio signals - once you destroy them (the ones responsible for high-frequency hearing DO NOT grow back (!!!)) you are done! We are having a generations of people growing up, who will be half-death by the age of 40).

The normal listener will settle for the 128kbps+ MP3 or rip the CD to their iPhone via a shitty algorithm and download a "make it LOUDER!" app, so that their earbuds "bump" like a Tahoe pimped by West Coast Customs. That ain't workin'.
 
The music we offer is a service not really a product. Its taken the music industry a decade to learn that all over again.

They leaned heavily on the sell of CDs but the only thing we typically own with a CD player is a Car!! NO one owns a walkman, no one owns or uses a standalone CD player, Even Computers have ditched CD drives and iPads damn sure don't have them.

So its taken awhile for multibillion dollar corporations to understand its useless to push a useless device like a CD. Its all about services like Spotify.

NOW the question is how do artists make money off of services involving streaming
 
^^^^Better yet......how are they going to "promote" the streaming of it in the future?

Will what next after Twitter, Facebook, have a great use for other ways of promotion? Those sites were never intended for you as an artist but they made and found a way for you to do what you do today. But what about the sites for tomorrow? Because after a while the labels won't need them at all because they have advertisement coming straight to your PHONE. Will the average joe be able to do the same? No....you can have soundcloud, soundclick, blah..blah..blah. But you are going to have to work 10 jobs or have a rich uncle to get it just a tiny bit like the majors are about to do it. So what everyone need to do is push soundcloud, soundclick, or whoever they use now into jumpin hard on the mobile bandwagon.......so people who use their service "FOR FREE" can feel like they have a chance at spamming again. THEY ALL SUUCK FOR MOBILE.......all of them.

Not a good look........nope.....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top