T
thebiz
New member
That post was very good
I understand what you're saying, but there are instances when even "real" artists may choose to cover a song. Look at older music. Popular songs were re-corded with different artists, records cut and re-sold to the public. How is this possible? because the songwriter owned that song and can re-sell it and did. This doesn't necessarily dis-credit the artist. While I agree with your point, I still must play devil's advocate and say there are possible cases when the music resonates so deeply with said artist that he/her doesn't mind using recycled instrumentals. The public and record company won't necessarily balk at this idea because it already has something going for it, instant recognition (in the case of a popular song). A real artist will still bring his/her unique voice to it and hope it will be well-received...
Okay I'm done... and yes I know artists capable of re-making great songs are few and far between, but I'm saying...
Nonexclusive beats.
Who really wants them?
Do you hear the same exact beat being used on more than one big song?
What do you think they are worth?
A song is what defines an artists identity. No "real" artist will use the same backing music for a song on his album which has already been on someone elses album.
Nonexclusive beats.
Who really wants them?
Do you hear the same exact beat being used on more than one big song?
What do you think they are worth?
A song is what defines an artists identity. No "real" artist will use the same backing music for a song on his album which has already been on someone elses album.
An artist and record company wants a song to be so distinctive that you know what it is from the first second you hear it on the radio... they do not want you to have to listen to half of the song before you figure out which of the 10 songs that use that same beat this one is.
What is a "nonexclusive" beat? a beat that is not "your own"... it is a "beat" that you very well may hear the next day on someone elses album.
Hmmmm... does that sound like something with a different name?
It is no different than a "sample CD"
A sample CD is full of beats that you license nonexclusively.
You can get 1000 "beats" on a sample CD for $30.
That means you are paying 3 cents per "beat" when you buy a sample CD.
That means that the going rate for a "nonexclusive" beat is around 3 cents.
People here complain about other producers here devaluing the worth of a "producers" product by charging low prices.
If you sell a "nonexclusive" beat for $1, that seems like a lot of money for something I can get for 3 cents off of a sample CD.
Nobody selling "exclusive" beats should be worried about someone selling "nonexclusive" beats. "Nonexclusive" is a totally different market. If you are trying to sell your "beats" with the intent of making it to a "real" album, you will have to be in an "exclusive" market.
If you want to be "valued" as a producer, you should not worry about what price other people are selling their "beats" for...
If you want to be "valued" as a producer, you should worry about making excellent music and conducting yourself in a professional manner.
Remember, the fancy fine dining restaurant that sells a steak for $85 does not care about the truckstop selling a steak (plus 2 side dishes) for $3.
...just something to think about![]()
People, why are we focusing on a beat that has been sold whether they are exclusive or non-exclusive. If you sold it, that $hit is history.
If someone else wants it, and you let them know it was leased (you are telling people you already leased it right?) and they want it, good for them, pay me, here-.
But you are suppose to be making the next beat to better than the previous ones you already done. If you are a beat a month, make all your beats exclusive if you want. If you are beat machines, least a few sell a few do what you want.
It's all about being a business man, do what's right for you and your customer, be flexible to their needs but make sure your needs are met also.
If an artist is "broke" you can let him dig through your stock pile of leased beats until he's able to make some money but don't just deal with broke a$$ ninjas (or who pretends to be) they will pay for Jordans but won't pay for a beat. I bet this same "Broke" person had PS2 PS3 and Xbox 360 in there crib.
And besides if they are rockin' their Great-grand uncles hand me down sneakers and they are talented, work with them, don't just sale beats and run, you have so much freedom when it comes to selling your product why don't you utilize them.
Stop selling beats and run, off to the next thing, you run yourself thin, draft up contracts to the situation, get a damn lawyer and don't say you can't afford one. Could you afford that sidekick when you brought one?
There are purposes for non-exclusive, exclusive, and work for hire; use them accordingly. Like there is purpose for buying property, leasing property, and renting there are purposes for leasing, exclusivity, and work for hire.