I hear a lot of people using the term "good artist" a lot in this thread, but what does it mean? If your "art" is using overused metaphors, biting fellow artist's swagger (Wayne), and fabricating an unjustifiably boastful image, then yes, Drake is a true "artist." But just because it's "art" doesn't mean there's any substance to it. And there doesn't have to be. After all, it is only entertainment. that said, however, Drake is gonna fall off the map sooner than later, because he has very little substance. So live'em up now, feel his cliche "I wanna **** you girl" singles, and watch him puff his chest out in a vein attempt to look "hard."
I seriously don't hate Drake at all. I actually think he's more tolerable than MOST pop artists (and thats what he is) who are hot right now. I just see his career/image for what it is.
BTW, if you compare Drake's music/career to a rap legend (lets say Eminem for example), you can easily see why he isn't going to last that long. Yes, both artists are "expressing themselves", but one took major risks, pushed the envelope, and kept people guessing, whereas the other one took the "safe" route -- mainly, a radio-friendly air-conditioned approach. People get tired of the "friendly, conditioned" approach very quickly.
God, I love listening to myself talk.