Info on the Roland JS 30?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Styl
  • Start date Start date
Styl

Styl

New member
js30nk8.jpg


So a friend of mine and I bought this at a pawn shop maybe a year or more ago. I've tried using it before, but its rather limited, definitely not something I could use on the regular. Anyone ever used one of these to make beats, or has anyone ever owned one at all? Its an interesting piece of equipment, just not very useful to me.
 
Thanks for the links, those are some interesting reads. Haha damn, this thing was worth a grip back in the day. We only paid $40 I think. Maybe Ill try to use it to dirty up some samples...
 
I had one

Man I used to love it.

Probably not great for your purposes - here's why.

I bought and used it as a DJ tool, which is what I think it was designed for.

Brilliant for that, I used to take it. maxed out at 4Mb, with a zip drive to my gigs, and I used to get some strange looks back in '97.

I spent a long time at home carefully making samples, getting the tempo spot on and editing really tight so that a loop would hold with the song it came from.

Playing out I'd synchronise the tempo using tap tempo on the JS30, listening to the metronome beat on my headphones til it was locked to what I was playing out. The current equivalents are the Boss sp202/303/404 etc.

I'd throw loops or one shots over what I was playing.
You can also transpose a sample across the octave so you have it pitched up and down (but it didn't time stretch).

The sequencer sucks - no editing, limited quantise!

For making music you could use it as a basic midi sampler, and use your sequencer to fire stuff, or put some loops in and use them for inspiration. Also if you needed to play samples, announcements and one shots at gigs.

It's also cool for hands on control of making messed up really short loops - think fatboy slim rockerfellar skank, but really it's a dj tool for playing out.
 
When I used to mess with it every now and then, thats how it came off to me. Not the greatest for doing beats, but I thought it would be useful as a dj tool. Thanks for the info, its nice to hear from someone with experience with it.
 
Its basically a less advanced version of the SP-505. The SP-505 is highly slept on btw :)
 
Hmmmm, might have to look in the SP 505. Would be nice to find a vintage sampler that I can actually be productive with.
 
ya, look into it. Its got alot of really advanced features for its time. And its got the same sound as the SP-303 which is phat, warm, and dirty :)
 
505 feels cheap, feels like a damn toy. It does have advanced features for it's time, and the sound is nice yes. It can help you get a beat down really quick, but the sequencer sucks balls (you can still work it though).

JS-30, ****'s heavier than an asr-x pro. wtf?
 
lvngdead said:
505 feels cheap, feels like a damn toy. It does have advanced features for it's time, and the sound is nice yes. It can help you get a beat down really quick, but the sequencer sucks balls (you can still work it though).

JS-30, ****'s heavier than an asr-x pro. wtf?

What sucks about the sequencer ? I think the sequencer is sick on the 505/606. Its got more swing options than an MPC and good editing...only downfall I can think of is the 4 tracks...but if your lookin into a JS-30 4 tracks shouldnt be an issue :)
 
There's a lot of people that don't mess with the swing or quantize functions, I'm one of them. Sequencr ain't bad, especially for the 505's current price point, but it just ain't for me mayne.
 
Back
Top