you're right...
reason isn't the be all end all of
programs... that's undeniable.
but my point is merely that convos
like these usually do nothing but
send people down a spiral of trying
so hard to focus on software and
then they start neglecting the
software/hardware in their headd
(heh! had to do it)
it's not something that is unique
with software... it happens with
hardware, too.
ppl just wind up focusing on technology
too much and losing sight of where your
true focus should be.
but the reality is, if a person has
Reason, they can mimic most of what
everyone else is doing in other programs
with alittle ingenuity.
what happens with blanket statements is
they don't even try.
They don't try to warm up samples thru learning compression and EQing and filtering tricks...
they don't try to warm up synths thru rendering, REXing them, re-sampling them, automating the features in one of the synths, et al
there are techniques that you can use in Reason that, if you put some time into it and think abit, you can do similar things in other programs.
yes, it's tediuous.
yes, it's alittle time consuming.
so is long division.
there are easier methods, but if you
learn just the easiest methods, you're
losing out in one of the benefits of being able to tax your programs -- critical thinking.
yes, i'm from THAT school of thought.
which sucks when someone used to come over and all I had was ACID and SF and Reason... and I had to go thru this taxing process to mimic what they wanted done and they kept saying "you know, in Logic, i could just re-route this to that and press this button and it's done..."
well, that's great in all... but without critical thinking, how can you expect to push the boundries of your programs.... and yes, we all know the developers have people aboard that do that for them... they push the systems, try new things to see if they can work with the program... they're usually called deconstructors or something like that...
but artists need to do that, too. they need to learn how to push boundries.
it all plays on each other... just like math.
you want the color green but all you got is blue and yellow... you can paint your grass blue... or your money yellow... or you can think outside the box and mix some colours... without that basic sort of critical thinking, we'd have never known as early as we did that yellow and blue makes green.
yes, a person can go out and say "man, they say i need Cubase b-c Reason is this that or the other"... or they can say "ok, i KNOW i can do this... let's figure out how..."
again, yes,m it's tedious... almost as tedious as reading this post, i'm sure (sorry about that guys), but software is supposed to enhance us, not dumb us down. and the reason we're surrounded by so much crap music is b-c software is making it easier for ppl to just point and click to the next pop hit.
critical thinking helps on all levels.
(recent studies have shown that artists tend to actually do really phukkin' good in math... it's the reason ppl defend music programs in school...)
math and art are linked forever by critical thinking... the tendancy to run at the first sign of limitation (either discovered by you or pointed out to you) hinders that... in by doing so, hinders art.
damn, i just realized that i threw a tangent up in this b!tch big enough oto fly a Boeing 747 thru.
sorry about that, guys -- but i feel very strongly about topics like this. and, that's good that we have forums like these that, when used properly, inform and inspire like it does. and for that, i love you all... even the ones who piss me off. (no one in this thread, tho.)