Peasant Nikon said:
I personally think that any straight-arm puts the cart in a bad position for your vinyl, but that will just start an argument, so ignor that I said it. ...
No argument, here...that's a known issue. On "audiophile" turntables wtih straight tonearms.
Refer to this post in the archives:
https://www.futureproducers.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=22551
Check out this article from KAB USA:
http://www.kabusa.com/str8_doc.htm
You will see "audiophile" turntables with straight tonearms, but they actually do it right, as in they have proper overhang and offset angle accounted for in the design of the headshell. This is also like you see in the Gemini's. As that article refers to, straight tonearms for DJ applications are underhung. This creates more stability, but more distortion and record wear.
EDIT: Another thing, about the spherical versus elliptical...there is no argument either that when you use underhung straight tonearms for DJ's, you must use spherical needles. I'll just rip a quote from that KAB article...
The straight arm has found a new home with Scratch DJ's, because, the needle is more stable in the groove when the platter is being spun back and forth as that artform requires. The trade off is excessive groove wear and distortion.
Because of the excessive tracking error of 17 degrees, you must never use elliptical styli in a straight arm. The fine edges of the elliptical profile depend on near perfect tangental alignment. with an error of 17 degrees, these fine edges become sharp cutting tools and will shave the surface of the vinyl groove. Stick with conical or spherical shaped styli when using a straight Scratch DJ tonearm.
This presents a dilemma for the home enthusiast because many of these Scratch DJ turntables are coming equipped with 78 speed which makes them appealing to record collectors. Our advice is to choose a conventional offset tonearm style instead. Leave the straight tonearm for the Scratch DJ's. If you have read this and understand it, tell a friend and pass the word. It will make life alot easier for the collector or audio enthusiast about to make a turntable purchase.
So, regardless of the argument whether or not spherical or elliptical create more or less record wear, etc. ellipticals will be a nightmare to your vinyls when used with straight tonearms. And we're talking straight...not S-shaped a'la Technics, or straight tonearm with a kink in it a'la Gemini 2400, but straight as in straight line from stylus down through the tonearm to the pivot point. If you have one of these...for the love of your vinyl records, you
must use spherical!
EDIT 2:
Peasant Nikon said:
... I believe the gemini SA series has LONG straight arms, that put the cart in the same position as a curved arm with a normal headshell. Therefore, having a concorde on a SA series puts it in a position different from both the technics and vestax tables. ...
Nikon, I'm not sure about how the SA series differs from where the tonearm puts the axis of the needle at in relation to the record, but I'm sure that it's pretty similar. Maybe their deisgn is a variation on the Technics, where the angle the S would put the headshell at is incorporated into the headshell itself? Therefore, it would place the needle at the same axis as a Technics tonearm would? If that's the case, it would seem that you would
need to use the Gemini headshell to be sure the correct adjustment is incorporated. Otherwise, it would perform just like a straight tonearm, and then you wouldn't be able to use ellipticals. This is all just a guess, don't know for sure...
I'd take caution, and peruse the archives. Although sometimes this can raise more questions than it can provide answers
