
909 County Fair
Member
Of course sample packs are nice, but is anybody happy with their own "found sounds" these days?
With costs of portable recording devices being so low lately, there might be a lot of really impressive outdoor (and indoor) potential.
I'm hopefully about to buy a field recorder later today. I've got brilliant ideas of going to the local junkyard after hours to bang and scrape on some junk for special sounds. I'm not even caring if the recorder is so cheap that it's WMA, mono at 8 kHz sampling rate. I'm seeking to make weird drums and percussion sounds. I'll assemble them into stereo later.
One idea I also have is to shove 2 completely separate and distinctly different sounds into the same Mid-Side maxtrix to transmogrify them into a nice kind of stereo on the MS-stereo output side. For that matter, I might start doing all of my recordings in mono to save RAM and drive space/capacity and CPU/overhead too.
If it's all just stereo at the output, and not so much at the input, it'll still work out if I do it right. It's kinda like a different way to do doubling, but the two "takes" can be of completely different contents smushed together into the Mid-Side algorithm. I've been planning this for a long time. I think it'll work out.
Also, using Mid-Side techniques might make mixing for stereophonic easier, because there's inherently adjustable balance for the center OR the sides... per sonic element. It's a good way to save track/channel space too--very efficient patchbay kind of economy. For example:
1) If the DAW can only support 8 channels, instead of ending up with only 4 stereo paths before bounce time, there can be 8 paths done in multiple stages of mid-side computation and recovery. So like, if you really need to record all 8 instruments, but that collapses everything to mono, just preplan to "stereoize" whatever you need later on, using Mid-Side mixing techniques.
2) So the main file can still store the crucial data and use up the track capacity without losing the main musical idea. It might sound odd, but a lot of odd sounds sound great!
I think my drums are going to end up astounding, synths too.
But I don't have anything to share yet.
When I get some stuff done properly, I'll be back to post some examples for y'all.
I'm deeply nested in several layers of pre-planning.
It'll be good to get the portable recorder to get me out of this computer more often.
What's in you folders?
With costs of portable recording devices being so low lately, there might be a lot of really impressive outdoor (and indoor) potential.
I'm hopefully about to buy a field recorder later today. I've got brilliant ideas of going to the local junkyard after hours to bang and scrape on some junk for special sounds. I'm not even caring if the recorder is so cheap that it's WMA, mono at 8 kHz sampling rate. I'm seeking to make weird drums and percussion sounds. I'll assemble them into stereo later.
One idea I also have is to shove 2 completely separate and distinctly different sounds into the same Mid-Side maxtrix to transmogrify them into a nice kind of stereo on the MS-stereo output side. For that matter, I might start doing all of my recordings in mono to save RAM and drive space/capacity and CPU/overhead too.
If it's all just stereo at the output, and not so much at the input, it'll still work out if I do it right. It's kinda like a different way to do doubling, but the two "takes" can be of completely different contents smushed together into the Mid-Side algorithm. I've been planning this for a long time. I think it'll work out.
Also, using Mid-Side techniques might make mixing for stereophonic easier, because there's inherently adjustable balance for the center OR the sides... per sonic element. It's a good way to save track/channel space too--very efficient patchbay kind of economy. For example:
1) If the DAW can only support 8 channels, instead of ending up with only 4 stereo paths before bounce time, there can be 8 paths done in multiple stages of mid-side computation and recovery. So like, if you really need to record all 8 instruments, but that collapses everything to mono, just preplan to "stereoize" whatever you need later on, using Mid-Side mixing techniques.
2) So the main file can still store the crucial data and use up the track capacity without losing the main musical idea. It might sound odd, but a lot of odd sounds sound great!
I think my drums are going to end up astounding, synths too.
But I don't have anything to share yet.
When I get some stuff done properly, I'll be back to post some examples for y'all.
I'm deeply nested in several layers of pre-planning.
It'll be good to get the portable recorder to get me out of this computer more often.
What's in you folders?