ethernine,
your reaction on the many 'Roland blaming' threads here in the forum isn't really surprising me, and as I said in several other threads these are some of my findings:
+
1. Roland did make state-of-the-art synths in a previous era; look at the vintage analog synths and drummachines like the Jupiter 8 (my favourite), the Juno's, the alpha-Juno's, JX-series, SH-101,
MC-202, TB-303, modulars like
the System 100m, the awesome Roland vocoders, TR-808 and TR-909, the S-series samplers, and many more...
2. Roland has made state-of -the-art harddiskrecorders like the VS-series (880/1680/2480/...)
3. Roland has made some of the best ROM-sample modules and synths (the JV-, XP- and XV-series); imho a little better than the rival ones from EMU (Proteus series) or Korg (Trinity, Triton)
4. Roland was one of the pioneers of VA (virtual analog) synths with the JP-8000 - which is still very popular (and imho that's an appropriate popularity)
-
1. the day they released the Groovebox-series, imho Roland left its state-of-the-art image by creating gear for the "big masses", full of mid-quality rom samples, lots of attracting knobs, d-beam, and other mambo jambo; good toys for beginning producers, but double crap for more serious producers (and I'm not only talking about the mega-studio's here)
2. generally the latest Roland synths and modules are imho so mass-oriented (the big money, you know), that Roland gives the impression to have given up quality for quantity
and I definitely know what I'm talking about; I think I must have played almost all Roland synths (older and newer), I'm looking to buy
a Jupiter-8, and I'm the lucky owner of a Juno-60,
MKS-50 ( = alpha Juno 1 module), TB-303, JP-8080, and XP-30; I ever had
a VS-880 hd recorder and
a MC-303 Groovebox, bot I sold these...
but we may not forget: Roland still IS one of the biggest instruments companies in the world (speaking about the scale)
but is that a pro or
a contra ?
THM