bandcoach
Zukatoku - Mod Scientist
we all read what we want to read
I'm critical of FL but I have a long base of daw use to back up my criticisms; the implementation and presentation of features is overwhelming for a beginner or an experienced sw based engineer/composer alike; the interface is little short of laughable, failing most of the basic concepts of HUI, and the features are either hidden or get in the way, both approaches making it difficult to actually get it to work well at any given task.
I started using daws in 1987 and have continued to do so as they have grown in complexity and features,
I am not critical of Reason to the extent that I am of FL, I understand what I want to do and I understand how Reason allows me to do that, some of the implementation is niggly, but it is well crafted and engineered nonetheless
I do not limit myself to one daw (I also use cubase, audacity, pd and BiaB); each of my daw's suffers from flaws and idiosyncracies; but I do not blame them for my failing to produce well-crafted products;
I'm critical of FL but I have a long base of daw use to back up my criticisms; the implementation and presentation of features is overwhelming for a beginner or an experienced sw based engineer/composer alike; the interface is little short of laughable, failing most of the basic concepts of HUI, and the features are either hidden or get in the way, both approaches making it difficult to actually get it to work well at any given task.
I started using daws in 1987 and have continued to do so as they have grown in complexity and features,
I am not critical of Reason to the extent that I am of FL, I understand what I want to do and I understand how Reason allows me to do that, some of the implementation is niggly, but it is well crafted and engineered nonetheless
I do not limit myself to one daw (I also use cubase, audacity, pd and BiaB); each of my daw's suffers from flaws and idiosyncracies; but I do not blame them for my failing to produce well-crafted products;