I'm not sure this exercise will be of any use - at best it only serves to box yourself in, thinking other options are worse for a certain genre (which is unlikely). The answers you'll get are likely to be either:
"DAW X!" ...without an associated genre, because they didn't read the question properly and only came to tell you what they use.
"DAW X FOR GENRE X!" ...without any actual explanation, besides that they use that DAW for making a certain genre.
"I'VE HEARD DAW X IS GREAT FOR GENRE X" - yup, you heard about it from your friends. Or read about it on a forum. You haven't used it.
"FEATURE X MAKES DAW X THE BEST EVER" - which might be true, in the subjective world of that commenter, but probably doesn't make the competition markedly worse, even if that one feature might be extra useful in some particular thing.
...and that's the gist of it: yes, some DAWs might have some features that can be useful in a certain type of workflow when working with a certain type of music. That doesn't make it "best for genre x" - they're just suited to a certain way of working and the users touting them have adapted to how that particular thing works. Yes, technology has shaped and shapes modern music-making, but modern DAWs are so vast in their feature sets that they're perfectly adaptable for all kinds of things.
That said, I've gone through Pro Tools, Cakewalk (and subsequently Sonar), Cubase, Reason, Reaper, Logic and a few others before settling on Ableton. I'm so used to it that it's at the time being the best for me. I've done everything from black metal to ambient to techno to country to noise to dub reggae on it.