So i got this local artist telling me that i'm supposed to pay him to rap on a beat i made. And i'm not even charging him for the beat.
Is this how the buisness is now? Because i thought it was the other way around.
By the way this is not a stupid question. I'm pretty sure the artist is supposed to pay the producer for the beat. But i just want to know what this guy is thinking
This is how the business has been forever...
This is nothing new or unusual or strange...
If you want him to rap on *your* song for *you* so *you* have a finished song for *yourself*-- then you obviously should pay him. You are hiring him as a musician.
If *he* is contacting you to supply music for *his* album that *he* is releasing-- then he obviously should pay you. He is hiring you as a producer or buying the backing track from you.
Those, of course, are just 2 scenarios...
You *both* may be doing a project *together* as a *group* where, in that case, neither of you pay eachother... in that case, the point is to make the record and you both try to make money from it.
This is no different from any other business transaction.
It is like this...
If you hired a photographer to take your modeling headshots for you--- you would pay the photographer for his services.
BUT...
If a photographer approached you and said he wanted to photograph you for a book he was doing--- he would pay you.
This is common sense.