You have to get the sample cleared first or get sued! Thats one of the reasons i stay away from sampling.
This is untrue. The person/label/entity that wants to release the music commercially is responsible for clearing samples. I sell sampled beats on the reg and it says in my production contracts that the artist is responsible for any sample clearance.[/QUOT
You must be dealing with newbie cats cuz i dont know anyone who knows just a small bit of music law would buy a uncleared sampled beat period! No one on sites like PMP would touch an uncleared sample beat with a 10 foot pole!
What if I change the pitch of the sampled vocal would that be enough to overlook clearance?
No, its not that easy. You need written permission from the publisher which costs money. No matter if its chopped, looped, pitched up its still a previous commercial recording. The art of sampling does come with a price tag. There are some who can sample without anyone ever knowing what they sampled and get away with. Also, I do believe it is cheaper if you can replay with instruments, a sample. Don't quote me there, but if you can replay a bass line with slight variation, you can say its original? Someone else will haveto chime in there......
Thanks for the info. What happens if I use the song as a bonus track in my album. Does that change anything? I think I read about that somewhere.
I've sold sampled beats, clearance is the artists problem. Make sure that you provide them with a list of all samples used though.