Mr.Curlz said:Your songs are published as soon as they are exploited...
Publishers do more than this. A good publisher finds ways for your songs to generate income, through licensing. A good publisher will look for commercials, movies, and tv shows to license your songs to. If you are a songwriter, they will find people to perform your music, or buy your music. You, as an artist will 1. Not have access to the people that a publisher has access to, and 2. Won't have the time to track all these resources down, and still concentrate on making good music. So, don't sleep on the role of a "good" publisher.Mr.Curlz said:You do not have to have a publisher to have your songs published. You can publish your own songs. All that a publisher does is getting people to sing your songs. If you can do that you can be a publisher.
PRboyz said:So, the songwriter get 50% and the publisher(ex.BMI)get 50% royalty?
So if I was to publish my own material, and I am the songwriter does that mean that I get 100%?
Last, but not least..how is the publishing royalty calculated, and does publishing only count for the songwriter?
What about the producer who composed the music?
FIX said:so ur saying that composers/writers dont really need to have a publisher if we can get our songs played on certain mediums then we could still get royalties...right? but its good to have a publisher cause they are like the "salesman" that actually make u money... is that right?