Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 58

Thread: Why do people say Fl Studio is the best DAW?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    FP Taliban
    Posts
    20,961
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts
    Sign in to disable this ad
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem Beats View Post
    FL's Piano Roll is designed around point-and-click creation from scratch.
    Many other DAWs (especially heavyweight linear sequencers like Cubase, Pro Tools, Logic) have piano rolls which are designed around modifying recorded MIDI.

    The difference manifests itself in numerous small feature/workflow differences, which make a big difference once combined. If you don't have a controller, FL's workflow is the way to go.
    A few of the tiny differences:
    - In many DAWs, "Quantize" is a single keystroke: "Q". In FL, Quantize is "Alt+Q", and is buried amidst several options in the menu. FL has fewer Quantize options than many other DAWs. Quantization simply isn't treated with the same sense of importance.
    - FL's Piano Roll starts out in Pencil Mode. Left click to create a note. Right click to delete it. Other DAWs usually start out in selection mode. Left-click-dragging immediately upon opening the Piano Roll in other DAWs usually creates a selection rectangle.
    - In FL's Piano Roll, you hear a note preview every time you create or drag a note. Some other DAWs don't do this, or offer this behavior as an optional feature that is turned off by default.
    - FL's Piano Roll comes with a ridiculous amount of MIDI modification tools for humanizing and adding interest to clicked-in notes - Strum, Flam, Pattern Chop, Arpeggio, Articulate, etc. You can even select chords to click-in, so that you aren't required to know how to form them. Some other DAWs have some of these features, but not to FL Studio's extent.

    Conversely, the same interface/features/workflow which make FL great for "click-and-create" production make it somewhat undesirable for using with a controller. Its a set of tradeoffs created by design.

    -Ki
    Salem Beats
    All those things can be adjusted/turned on/off in FL. I'm on a Mac so I'm not sitting in front of it, but you can turn auto quantizing on(I always do when I use it, it sets funny like 1/16ths are 1/4 whatever measurement FL uses). I do agree none of this stuff works right by default, can't remember if you have to save a template or if it just saves your settings, but I always setup an FL template before using it and it stays set afterwards.

    ---------- Post added at 10:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:37 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by SoulGhost View Post
    Did i say piano roll?
    you might want to read first,then comment.
    And by microwave beats,i mean cats bragging about taking 5 or 10 minutes to make a beat.
    That's nothing to brag about.

    Peace
    Let's be fair, have we not all(who've been doing this since the 90s at least)seen the guy who'd jump behind a Triton or Motif and go from nothing to a finished beat in 20 minutes? Or the guy who finds a sample and wrecks it on the MPC in seconds?This in all fairness isn't rocket science regardless of the tool used.

    Seems to me that people feel you should have to work harder to arrive at the same idea.

    I'd hope anyone who owns an MPC has made a 20 minute beat on it before. I've made my share, it just happens sometimes. Hell, I've even made 10 minute beats in Logic...and I don't know how to use Logic completely, lol.

    ---------- Post added at 10:50 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by ls2013 View Post
    I have seen many top 10 list of people putting FL Studio at the top saying it's the best. Usually when I talk to other producers about DAW's they regard FL Studio as an amateur software and say it's what they used to start off with but once they could afford better software they bought it. I have messed around with FL Studio before on a friends computer before I was serious about producing music but I never really used it to a full extent. I don't understand why these top 10 lists put FL Studio above even Logic and Pro Tools if so many people regard it as amateur.
    Best is a subjective word. What's best for some may not be best for others. I will give my opinion on the subject. For what I do, IMO FL Studio is the best program on the market for production. The day they release a Mac version with the same functionality as the PC version, it will be the only program I use(doubt that day will come though).

    I'm just confused to why people put so much energy into downplaying any music tool. Real drummers will say using a drum machine is "cheating". My thing is, if the finished product is up to par, who gives a f**k?
    Last edited by deRaNged 4 Phuk'dup; 09-04-2013 at 11:51 AM.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Salem, OR
    Posts
    2,347
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by deRaNged 4 Phuk'dup View Post
    All those things can be adjusted/turned on/off in FL. I'm on a Mac so I'm not sitting in front of it, but you can turn auto quantizing on(I always do when I use it, it sets funny like 1/16ths are 1/4 whatever measurement FL uses). I do agree none of this stuff works right by default, can't remember if you have to save a template or if it just saves your settings, but I always setup an FL template before using it and it stays set afterwards.
    Well, to go into more detail about FL's quantize:
    It doesn't have non-destructive quantize (the ability to undo or modify quantize without undoing several other project changes).
    It can't differentiate between a partial quantize (% toward a target) and a no-quantize zone ("Don't quantize if note is already within X ticks of the target."). There is only a "sensitivity" knob.
    In other DAWS (i.e., REAPER) you can tell it, "Hey, it's OK to move a beat forward, but not OK to move one backward". These advanced features are often useful, and don't exist in FL because FL users don't "need" them.

    The userbase overwhelmingly "clicks-in" notes, and the workflow reflects that. There's nothing wrong with that. Once it goes 64-bit, I'd really like to use FL alongside REAPER and Maschine for clicking-in complicated 64th-note drum fills and the like.

    -Ki
    Salem Beats

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    FP Taliban
    Posts
    20,961
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts
    ^^^I'm not sure about all that, but I'm not in front of FL to check and challenge it, so I'll take that as truth. I will add that alot of FL's potential is hidden until the user sets out looking for more professional features. They are however there with a few tweaks.

    Back when I was running FL the ONLY thing I "clicked in" was drums in the sample cell/step sequencer. I never clicked anything into a piano roll. That seemed way too tedious of a task for me. I use Reason the same way to this day. That's why they were both easily interchangeable programs for me. Taking a guess...I'd think more guys are using FL alongside keyboards as I do than clicking in notes unless guys are watching too many Lex Luger vids... Which I can't say is not happening, lol.

    EDIT: Just the other day I was shocked to see that Avicii clicks in his patterns. I thought he played all that stuff. Kinda weird to watch. To each their own though...if it works...
    Last edited by deRaNged 4 Phuk'dup; 09-04-2013 at 12:19 PM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NEWARK
    Posts
    4,725
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 106 Times in 105 Posts
    top 10 daws... are there even 10 out there? lol and i'd say it's most popular because its def the easiest daw once you learn what your doing...
    PRODUCED FOR SOULJA BOY/HONEY COCAINE/LIL B BEATS > http://www.youtube.com/user/CocaineAudi0 TWITTER =@SlurRty

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Salem, OR
    Posts
    2,347
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SwagProductionz View Post
    top 10 daws... are there even 10 out there? lol and i'd say it's most popular because its def the easiest daw once you learn what your doing...
    There are SO MANY. Much more than 10.

    There are probably 30 or so commonly-talked about ones on the Wikipedia page for "Digital Audio Workstation":

    Digital audio workstation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Off the top of my head, some of the most popular:

    1 Reason
    2 REAPER
    3 FL Studio
    4 Pro Tools
    5 Cubase
    6 Studio One
    7 Logic
    8 Sonar
    9 Audition
    10 GarageBand
    11 Nuendo
    12 Live
    13 Samplitude
    14 Digital Performer
    15 Sequoia
    16 Maschine (borderline DAW/sequencer, debatable, but popular nonetheless)

    -Ki
    Salem Beats

    ---------- Post added at 12:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:39 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by deRaNged 4 Phuk'dup View Post
    EDIT: Just the other day I was shocked to see that Avicii clicks in his patterns. I thought he played all that stuff. Kinda weird to watch. To each their own though...if it works...
    Were you just as shocked to find him using a pirated copy of Sylenth?

    Lol...

    -Ki
    Salem Beats
    Last edited by Salem Beats; 09-04-2013 at 12:59 PM.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    FP Taliban
    Posts
    20,961
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts
    ^^^That's what that was? lol. Wow. For some reason I thought more of that guy because of his genre of music. Guess you can't judge a book...

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Salem, OR
    Posts
    2,347
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by deRaNged 4 Phuk'dup View Post
    ^^^That's what that was? lol. Wow. For some reason I thought more of that guy because of his genre of music. Guess you can't judge a book...
    His PR people quickly came out with a "spin" statement saying that the reason he was using a cracked copy was that it had a nicer-looking GUI than the "official" version.

    His FutureMusic interview was one of several where high-profile producers were spotted used cracked plugs by observant viewers. You'd think that one of these guys would be clever enough to rename his production company to "Team AiR 2010" or something. Then, it wouldn't look so shady.

    I remember a Swedish House Mafia interview where they were quick to backpedal, saying something like, "Yeah we had to download... I mean BUY!... That plugin." Not an admission of guilt, but a weird time to pause and back up. Seems a little shady. I wouldn't have felt the need to "correct" myself.

    -Ki
    Salem Beats
    Last edited by Salem Beats; 09-04-2013 at 09:51 PM.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    5,819
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I don't use it but the reasons I think it is up there is because it is cheap, works well, easy to learn and Image-Line guarantee updates.
    Quote Originally Posted by alkota View Post
    Everyone is too worried about selling themselves before they even have a product that anyone wants.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    sylmar ca
    Posts
    99
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    its all in the flow in the process trust fl studio in 2-5 years will be prominently up there with pro tools and logic ask ur self what producer hasnt discoverd or adapted to the most inovative software since cool edit and acid pro ,calkwalk ..hands down vsti all day .
    Last edited by ismokefatnugs; 09-05-2013 at 12:01 AM.
    [URL]http://www.dopetracks.com/TheComissh[/URL]
    [URL]https://twitter.com/TheCommisshh[/URL]

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    86
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    My theory is this.
    FL Studio runs on PC and is not demanding when it comes to specs. Every household has a PC that has at least Windows Xp running which requires a minimum of 700mb of ram, this on it's own is enough to run FL Studio.
    With a simple torrent search people can get a cracked copy of Fl Studio for free and run it on their PC, then just get some free .wav samples from forums.
    So already they have the means to make a beat with spending any money.

    Then when it comes to the program itself you don't really need any knowledge of music because it was built to click in notes, you don't even need any midi controllers.
    This makes it even easier to make a beat (especially trap beats which only use a few chords).

    I think the userbase skyrocketed after Lex Luger Started making millions off his traps beats and people figured out they could make the same type of beats with no hassle.

    I think that FL Studio can be used to make professional music just like the other DAW's but it caters more towards amateurs which is why it's a lot of peoples first DAW.
    That's just my theory though, let me know what you guys think.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •