Tools

ianscott111 ianscott111 is offline
2,165 posts, Registered User
 
 
Hi,

I've asked this question before, however, I didn't specifically ask it for sampling...

I'm debating about whether to get a tube phono preamp (EAR 834P) for sampling from a Technics SL-1200 into an Ensoniq ASR-10. My question is, would the quality be worth the money ($900+)? I could buy a (much) cheaper phono preamp, however, if there is a difference in sound quality, I would buy the tube one. Thanks.
06-07-2005
Reply With Quote

dtwizzle dtwizzle is offline
22 posts, Registered User
 
 
I wouldn't spend that much on a phono preamp. Any good mixer will do just fine, and you can use vst/dx effets to warm it up if needed.
06-09-2005
Reply With Quote

baggysound's Avatar
baggysound baggysound is offline
3,090 posts, Registered User
 
 
well no vst or effect plugin can recreate the real warmth of a tube, but to be honest, this amount of money for just a phono pre-amp seems not worth it

06-09-2005
Reply With Quote

Wiggum, Ralph's Avatar
Wiggum, Ralph Wiggum, Ralph is offline
2,439 posts, Registered User
 
 
As most people know, Im real anal about mixing...

But this is the one time I don't think a tube preamp is needed. For the simple reason, that if you sample from very old records, it was done with alot of tube and other analog stuff anyway. So I really don't see that much of an advantage. Matter of fact, a tube VST , would not serve a purpose...

Just stick to a good phono preamp, plust the ASR converters have alot character.

Now if we are talkin about a regular preamp, now that is another story...

Principal Skinner, I got carsick in your office."
-Ralph Wiggum

06-09-2005
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2008 Future Producers, All rights reserved.

Got the shirts yet?