Broken Friday said:
Mixing on headphones should not be your primary source for mixing. It should be more so used for reference.
my main room has 60k mains (plus two 18" subs), NS10Ms and Events as near-fields, Mackies as mid-fields, $30 Creative computer speakers. there's a THX-surround room (yes, a certified one) one door away, just in case............I use the computer speakers 90% of the time.
I don't know how many of you got mains in your home studios
cry
.
so they can't be the MAIN (no pun) reference.
if you are serious about your craft and get used to monitoring thru headphones (it takes time, YES!), then the monitoring system ALONE doesn't equate to GREAT MIX QUALITY.
we are a community, where 90% of the people have semi-pro equipment/computer-only setups, 9% have semi-pro home studios and 1% has access to world class facilities.
you have to make compromises if you belong to the 99% fraction.
if you make the beats, compose them, engineer/mix them and maybe even record and mix the vocals (or in some cases even end up writing the songs/bars), you can't compete with TEAMS anyway.
you can't compete with WORLD CLASS STUDIOS.
that doesn't mean in the slightest sense, that you will end up with some crap coming out your speakers. that's the good thing about the 21st century.
so yeah, if you are a teen living with your parents, save some money for $100-250 headphones, instead of putting $800-1500 mid fields in your untreated bedroom.
if you can't come up with great music because of your headphones, an SSL board and 300k worth of outboard won't help you either.
P.S.: you don't have to be a great singer or beatmaker either. as long as you are willing to put hard work into the END PRODUCT, it's all good. just trying to send out a POSITIVE MESSAGE.
here's an example - most of you guys could've made it too.