
Originally Posted by
Track Rootz
Thank you for proving my point: You can play a piece without knowing chords even if it be as a robot.
Ok, NOW you are starting to make sense... I sounds like what you are trying to say is that the tone of the chord dictates how you play it. The thing is, you don't need to know the notes to understand the tone of chord. Someone with no musical knowledge can identify a happy or sad chord or even finishing chords from the rest of the chords in a piece. I know what chords are and their purpose, but what I don't know are the intervals used to form the chord and what you are saying has nothing to do with intervals. You are talking about tone...
If you can help please help, because it sounds like you have alot of knowledge, but please don't question the validity of the fact that I play in an orchestra.
Edit: Oh, and yes, key signatures determine what notes can be used in any chord formed in the piece. And therefore, they influence whether a piece is filled with "happy", "sad" chords etc.
1) No. I'm not talking about the "tone" of a chord at all. I'm talking about the function. And for sake of clarification, we should do away with the word "tone" altogether and use "character" instead. The character of a chord and the function of a chord are two COMPLETELY different things.
To illustrate:
Get your instrument and play these notes:
C E G, C E G, C F A, C F A, G B D, G B D, C E G, C E G
This is C major, F major, G major, C major. In the key of C major, I IV V I.
Now play these notes:
G B D, G B D, C E G, C E G, D F# A, D F# A, G B D, G B D.
This is G major, C major, D major, G major. In the key of G major, I IV V I.
Now each G major chord will have the same exact character: a major triad. If you care to, you can even call it "happy" to our Western ears. But are you meaning to tell me that they each SOUND the same in context? Absolutely not. In the first example, G major is the dominant and will want to resolve to C major. In the second example, G major is the tonic and will act as the point of resolution. So once again, their characters are the same but their functions are completely different. Night and day actually.
2) Key signatures have absolutely NOTHING to do with what notes can be used to form chords in a piece. Zero. Nada. As illustrated above, the same 3 notes, G B D, were used in two different keys and had completely different functions. G major can be played in any piece, regardless of the key. Hell, if you play a G major chord in the key of F# minor, you're going to hear something even more "out there" (specifically, bII).
3) Be careful about your assumptions about what people with no musical knowledge can do. People not of the Western tradition will prove each and every assumption you've made as false.
4) My statement about your orchestra had more to do with your orchestra than about you. I stand by my comment. But to clarify, go check out a middle school band. They'll [hopefully] be able to play at the same tempo and with the same rhythm, but it's going to be very strict and without rubato. Why is this? Because they have not developed the ear nor the brain to grasp the deep harmonic structures within a piece. They do not understand phrases and periods. This all comes later with education and experience. The ability of an orchestra to play together has a lot to do with the conductor, but it also has a lot to do with the ability of each musician to internalize the music in the same way. Whether you'd like to admit it or not, this is because of music theory.
Humans = Monkeys + Einstein
Bookmarks