last one has a mistake (starts on Em and is in fact a repeat of the previous one)
far too simplistic in your treatment of this - better to start from a melodic point of view
Yep and it is missing the point of modes entirely........
you were searching for modal, which suggests you really do not know what it is you are writing about........
what you gave here is not considered best practice in using Roman numerals anymore: you are using all caps with your Roman numerals which means you are asserting that all chords are Major (I know that you are not trying to do this, but modern Roman numeral usage in describing chordal concepts without reference to a home key says other wise).
So
I - C
ii - Dm
iii - Em
IV - F
V - G
vi - Am
vii
b5 - Bm
b5
and again you miss the point of modes completely, they are treated as if they exist in the home Ionian scale but are treated as separate, unique, modalities based upon a rotation of the tones in the Ionian to create new modes of sound.
| Mode |
Progression |
In the Ionian |
| Ionian |
I-IV-V |
- |
| Dorian |
i-IV |
ii-V |
| Phrygian |
i-bII |
iii-IV |
| Lydian |
I-V-ivb5-II |
IV-I-viib5-V |
| Mixolydian |
I-IV |
V-I |
| Aeolian |
i-iv | i-v |
vi-ii | vi-iii |
| Locrian |
ib5-V |
viib5-IV |
Memorise the above translations from the Mode to the Ionian and you can't go wrong...... however,
Please don't, you will make more errors than you can possibly imagine.....
Which you have made even more sickening with your incomplete and poor presentation of the nonsense which I have deleted in quoting you.
Bookmarks