Puppet said:theres two kinds of people... a true artist.. and a realistic artist
i guess i'm more realistic... i enjoy critisim... especially from the more experienced... so that my stuff sounds better. cuz when ive been working on a beat for 2 hours... it sometimes sounds hella weird when im done. cuz my ears are used to the weird sound for 2 horus . and after pausing for a while and not listening to it, and then listening to it again after 30 minutes.. it sounds all weird. thats why sometimes it may sound dope to u but not to others.
I don't think that's the best attitude to take towards criticism. Criticism is one of the best tools you will ever get to improve your music, so you shouldn't waste it. Like any tool, it can help or hurt, so you do need to be careful with how you handle it.straypixel said:Listen to advice from people you trust, ignore advice from those you don't and seek second opinions.
When it comes down to it, you only have to justify yourself to the people who buy the music.
cosign. when working on a beat there's usually at least one part that sounds bad to decent without the rest of the song. For example take some drums, say the kick has this weird EERRWEOOOH sound on it. Sounds like willy when you play the drum break alone. Put it under a melody that supports it and bam it's FIRE. This is why i wait till my songs at least up to the point where I'm mastering before I ask for critique.MrHope said:I avoid criticism of my songs during certain phases of the song creation. Sometimes I know what I'm doing and other people's input just distracts me from my musical goals.
But after those phases, I'm open to criticism because there are always things that I missed that others will catch. Most of the time criticism is useful, but occasionally somebody will say that they liked your song and still tell you to change everything about it. Instead of redoing the whole entire song according to a critic, it's often better to incorporate the advice into the creation of a brand new song.
Terrel said:Not necessary. You are to critique your own works of art. You know where the inspiration for the instrumental came from, someone else may draw from a completely different situation upon listening. Especially if you tell them, directly or indirectly, to find out what's wrong with the instrumental. If someone told me to find something wrong with their work, I'd say whatever I hear that is different. Different means good in the world of music. The only criticism you should encounter, should be your own.
You can make an instrumental, then listen to an album that you like, or the radio. Lose yourself in the music, and once you go back over your instrumental, you can tell if you want to delete it, or fine tune it for further listening.
Terrel said:Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. I doubt anyone will imitate you if you are the one imitating, to a certain extent. Criticism stems from more than what you think it does. When a person asks to be criticized, who ever they ask will purposely find things to criticise. When a person spontaneously criticizes, it is my belief that jealousy is the cause. More than one person will view your art, so why settle for changing you art for a sole person.
deRaNged 4 Phuk'dup said:If you do hip hop or Pop and want to be successful, you have to be aware of what your target audience wants.
At the same time, if you're doing Hip hop/Pop(manufactured music), don't think being "different" to the point it's abstract gives you a pass. Nobody's gonna want to hear that sh*t.
No_Worries said:Sheesh...I don't know if this attitude is based on absolute self-confidence or absolute lack of confidence in the critic!