M.C.Gray
New member
It's funny because I had this discussion with my uncle a couple of days ago. He is a techno producer and plays, composes and constructs every pattern, sound, progression etcetera himself.
While me on the other hand i sample everything, i need a deep kick i search through all my records (or cop new ones) just to find that kick to complement the song. Same with hats, vocals, bass line. If i want a certain II - IV - V progression played on a mandolin i will have to search my ass off or chop a I - V - IV - II progression on a mandolin to my desired results. What i mean is that sampling to me is an art form. It takes a lot of time and energy and creativity to have an idea in your head and mold it with just using samples.
To me personally just taking one loop and leave it unaffected is a No go but that's my personal view. If just that loop tells the perfect story you want to convey and you add little bits of yourself to make the story come out more then I respect it.
Samples are bits of sound recorded from a pre-existing source. If there was no bird to record there was no sample. If there was no bongo band there was no apache break. In that context no sample use is original. But the story of the reconstructed or recomposed sample still can be original. Or the message or vibe it should convey. If i used the bongo break and made reggae from it (wich someone has probably already done but lets say it hasnt been done before) then the bongo break is unoriginal but the full reggae composition and the new vibe it brings hasn't been felt before in the combination with that break.
Epiloque; even if the source isn't original your idea or reconstruction can still convey never heard of stories or never felt moods.
idk if anyone is following what i'm trying to say but i hope it contributes to this thread haha.
El
Im feelin ya man. Sampling is an art form and J Dilla proves that very well. Unfortunately the market for sample producers is very scarce, but I appreciate the music that comes from it.
Last edited: