Also wanted to say that it is important to be aware of how the monitoring solution compresses various parts of the frequency range, ideally you want minimal compression so that you can dial in the correct amount of compression in order to end up with nice sounding dynamics. It is also important to be aware of the "weak spots" of speakers or cans, they might for instance have too much or too little low end, so when you use that as a reference point you have to balance with that weakness included, not excluded. That's the art, to integrate the monitors with whatever strengths and weaknesses they have, some are then more challenging to integrate than others.
But it is not only about the speakers or cans, when you don't know for instance how bass heavy your monitors/acoustics or cans are compared to monitors/acoustics or cans out there, your escape from a monitoring issue in that case is by doing proper A/B. So over time you will basically learn how to make mixes/masters that translate well simply because you become more and more experienced at knowing the target frequency response to dial in.
Constantly trying to get a wider perspective on monitoring is the smart route.
One more thing. It is actually also important to understand what commercial hit mixes that have a great frequency response, like what are truly great sounding mixes. Many think that just because a mix has been popular on the commercial level it must have a great frequency response. It is not like that. These mixes are great due to other things. It is worth spending a lot of time choosing the right reference mixes.