so what the legal eagles seem to be saying is that...if a record label hires me to produce a beat for them and the beat contains sample, they pay me for services rendered, i go home and count my money, then i'll have to worry about being sued for making the beat. that just doesn't make sense to me.
the reason why selling beats online has become so popular is because of the way the whole entertainment industry has changed due to a massive leap in technology. i can make a movie at home that is just as high quality as a tv movie. so now
artist are able to promote themselves, shoot the video themselves and sell their own product. which comes with being able to have instant access to original music. which we as producers provide. i don't see any difference from me being hired by the record label and being hired by an independant
artist and being paid for services rendered. clearing samples has always been the job of the record label. so as an indie
artist you take on all the resposibility of the label.
with all that crap being said...i do both. samples and 2 finger keys. depending on the feel that i or
the artist wants. it still boils down to a fee for a service. and if i specify in my contract where the samples came from and that they are paying for my services or work as a producer and that they are responsible for sample clearing before they use the beat for monetary gain for the project. i'm good!
i don't know when we started comparing beat slingin' to dope slingin'. can't believe a forum called future producers would be reduced to that.