the legal jargon is supposed to make sure that lawyers have a job. that makes sense now.
anyhow, from what i understand. there's different streams of income and ways to for the record/music company to generate money from an artist.
with that being the foundation. why not write up a contract that is beneficial to both sides? why all the extra unnecessary stuff. trying to lock someone up,
or get someone caught up in a bad deal to keep someone indebted to them is not really beneficial to either side.
terms? how many albums you wanna make? are you a songwriter? a producer? do you wanna make it a deal based on per song?
territory?
recording funds? how much am i going to be paid? straight up. no need for "non-recoupable," contingent on the vertices of the congruent rhombus of derivative auxillary dividend
arbitrary ancillariness. what does that mean? i don't know either. no bullshit, extra confusing jargon, overdraft fee, interest, i just wanna put you in debt so you owe me and i "control" you as an artist.
you want me to record this album. you pay me. we can come up with a fair wage.
if you're going to give me a certain amount of money to record this album, then we can map out, or decide what the money is going to go to.
if you're a producer, it's to upgrading your equipment. building your studio. establishing relationships with an engineer who will mix your records. studio access.
if you're a songwriter. money to go to recording equipment, so you can record demos. money to buy beats from producers so that you can write to original/exclusive beats. studio time.
if you're a performer/artist, money to go to finding the songs you want to purchase. to help you book shows, if you would rather skip the whole selling tickets to book shows. getting beats, all that stuff.
royalties? simple split. what 25%? what are all the revenue streams? 25% of all of that. so if a record company is responsible for "branding," "marketing," "promoting" and all that, then they are going to make way more money. their
job is supposed to be to take you from selling your music at shows, and hustling it, to making it available to everybody by putting it in stores. they are to distribute your product (from a business stand point.)
licensing? 50%, if I'm solely a writer? 25%, if i'm solely a producer 25%. if I make the beat and write the song? that means I have 50% ownership of the actual song. maybe even an extra 5% for writing the hook. assuming i wanted to own more than 50% of the song i wrote. now if you can get that song in movies, or you have access to artists that you feel are better suited to record the songs i write or have people you want to interpolate or spruce up "rough" beats. that's fine. i make fifty percent for making it. you make fifty percent for getting it exposure.
social media? live videos and interviews. so the fans can interact. in todays day and age the artist is supposed to be engaged somewhat with his audience. you want to have some sort of relationship or commonality with the person who's music you purchase or support. so to provide that platform, for again that exposure, would be "part of the job" in essence. but the record label should provide the artist with the "press kit" type of stuff to again help create that brand.
ticketing? if you put up the show and are again creating a platform for me to perform and do my music (as an artist) then we can split that like 25 to 50%. depending on how popular of an artist from 0 to 50% is a lot of room to work with. if im trying to demand 50% of the ticket money, without proving myself that doesn't make sense.
an example: kanye west had that Glow in the Dark tour a few years back. That show was one of the best shows I've ever been to. He was in his super prime. Around the time Graduation dropped. N.E.R.D., Rihanna, and Lupe Fiasco. there was a crazy big ass set, it was in a huge ass stadium. it was a huge ass production. if you were a sponsor, you would love to have your product there, or you would essentially be lobbying to get your product at one or
as many of those shows as you can. if you get fifty thousand people paying fifty dollars for a ticket. that's 2.5 million dollars. tickets weren't only fifty dollars. people are going to drink water. they're gonna get beer. they're gonna get hungry. they're gonna wanna buy a shirt or some sort of merchandise. you know the deal. if you go to a major concert like that you're probably going to be bringing at least fifty bucks with you. so again that's like fifty thousand people going into a situation with a hundred dollars a head. (that's a couple of coachellas when you do that math after a 40 or 50 city tour.)
so kanye and friends can demand fifty percent of all ticket sales and divide that amongst themselves. so if you generate 2.5 million dollars a show. and do 50 shows. thats what 102.5 million or something like that. i dont know but you get the point.
anyhow you might think. ahh hell naw, record labels ain't gonna give an artist half of ticket sales like that. but they would and they should, because if i were gonna make a couple hundred million, would that really hurt me to give the artists ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, sixty, seventy-five million out of all that money? not at all.
i know there's a lot of paranoia, and an idea of fear that's been created by all of the music industry horror stories. but at the same time, the music industry is referred to as a machine. why fight the machine. man made machine. machine didn't make man. so let's make it work for us.