hollandturbine
New member
^^^You're wrong for thinking that's what I'm saying.
All i've said is what you learn when you're 2 with the toy with the different shape holesand pegs you put thru. You try to stuff a triangle into a square slot...you are no more right/wrong than someone who tries to shove a circle into a triangle slot. Sexual deviance covers EVERYTHING that isn't a triangle peg in a triangle slot. Human law decides what forms are right and wrong and it varies from state to state/country to country.
The point of my post was the problem isn't that we now know Elmo is gay....or that he likes them young. The only reason he's in trouble is because of the guy allegedly being under 18. Now it's been set straight(pun intended) we're supposed to go back to life as usual and pretend it isn't wierd that Elmo's voiced by...this guy. A guy waiting around for your son he's teaching to turn 18(or lie about it) to avoid jail time. Now WE HAVE TO BE COOL WITH THAT.
Meanwhile we find out that military guys who are away from their ugly wives get slightly nicer looking sidepieces(duh)and we gotta make this into the biggest scandal of the millennium. Getting grown poon is a bigger theat than 50 year olds f**king lil boys on their 18th b-day.
I guess people are too smart to really read what someone's posting. They already know what you meant without analyzing your words. Gotta make sure you jump right up on defence even when there isn't a fight, huh?
That was exactly what you were saying, you were equating homosexuality with pedophilia by using the blanket term "sexual deviance" while making the argument that the acceptance of homosexuality leads to the acceptance of pedophilia, basically you were presenting the slippery slope fallacy.
You should probably stop trying to use messy analogies when making a point because you tend to use incompatible concepts that end up going all over the place.