so you believe your manager shouldn't bring up split-sheets and cash payment at the time of handing over the instrumental??
i mean if its just a producer and artist it should already be established who did what, you never want to come off like a hard ass like "im not doing the song until we get paperwork done"
or else they just wont work with you
for example
An A & R hits me up for beats for an artist on the label working on his debut album, due in stores May 17th.
once you figure out what the budget is looking like (you can kinda tell based on features and other producers on the album), i'd send off like 10 or so beats, and 2-3 weeks later they say.. yo this artist is rocking with 2 joints for the album. Now if they ask for wavs. thats when you ask for them to cut a check. You should not be sending out wavs unless they cutting a check period. Thats how producers get ****ed up, its how i got ****ed up in the past. Sending off wavs to records, and them not paying me or making it a struggle to pay me
theyre gonna try to give you shit, but at that point you should be getting paid for your stuff. Then they should be giving you a contract about the records theyre buying.. and the shit for the album.
i mean thats how i work.
but if you send em beats, and the record just drops on the internet, youre not getting paid for that in this music industry, maybe online with online artists or in certain situations
but youre not getting paid just because somebody records to your beat
---------- Post added at 02:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:50 PM ----------
because if they pay you when an artist records.. what if the A & R of the album doesnt like the beat but likes the song.. and has another producer do a version of it. then they gotta pay that producer 2?
labels only paying for guaranteed records, unless youre a big name producer