I heard about how 2pac almost had no money at the time of his death because Suge Knight was known to dupe artists into signing their publishing to his company. How does one fall for this when everyone should know the money is in publishing? I see lots of bands usually on smaller labels that have publishing on the company's name not the artists. I know for a fact those bands don't sell much therefore my assumption is it's because the label is so indie that they can't afford to pay publishing to the artists so they keep it instead since most of those bands are young and clueless to begin with.
I would assume publishing usually is 50/50, as a standard? Maybe this is true with a publishing company but maybe not with record labels?
I would assume publishing usually is 50/50, as a standard? Maybe this is true with a publishing company but maybe not with record labels?