acetheface954
Active member
hi again. if a copyright owner gives an entity exclusive rights over their property does that mean the copyright owner is barred from re-marketing their own work with other entities?
hi again. if a copyright owner gives an entity exclusive rights over their property does that mean the copyright owner is barred from re-marketing their own work with other entities?
Bandcoach is correct.
Something to think about:
If you are the copyright owner and you want to grant someone "exclusive usage rights" to your music and would also like to further capitalize off of your work [eg: making your music available as a instrumental collection that you can sell on itunes, etc.] you should probably state that in your exclusive contract before all is said and done.
Good luck.
I'd love that. Because I always want to remain the licensor and make everyone else a licensee. But I'm not big enough to make an entity sign a nonexclusive contract. They always want complete control over where the property goes. Bastards lol.
It's all in how you structure the contract. You don't need to be a big entity to structure a deal like this, you just need fair terms and some of interest.
check this older thread response https://www.futureproducers.com/for...ve-rights-advice-pricing-473448/#post49777645