which one of these is a better sampler? i'm familiar with the 1000 already but it got ****ed up in a car crash, i can get both for roughly the same price. i'm willing to put the time in to learn the 2000xl if it is better.
which one of these is a better sampler? i'm familiar with the 1000 already but it got ****ed up in a car crash, i can get both for roughly the same price. i'm willing to put the time in to learn the 2000xl if it is better.
It's all opinion & theories bruh. Lol might as well get the 2500.
the 1000 is newer and has more features the 2000xl isn't much older and imo feels better than the 1000. It really depends on what you want.
i'm seeing roland mv8000s for only a hundred or so more, what about them?
The MV-8000 will require you to use a PC, whereas the 1000 / 2000xl is standalone.
Honestly, I would go with the 1000. It has more RAM capability (128MB vs 2000XL's 32MB) and you can put a HDD in the 1000, where the 2000XL uses floppy and expensive SCSI drives.
yeah the monitor option was an add on. In 2004 the MV 8k was supposed to be the mpc killer but it didn't work out. Idk why most ppl I know with a MV really love them I always took the mpc series over the rolands but I really only like Roland synths mainly the vintage ones like Junos and Jupiters
When it comes to these two machines you should base your decision on OS functionality, because if you decide in favor of the MPC1000 you can latter add a cheap rack sampler such as an S2000/S3000 that is quite comparable to the MPC2000 in terms of sound.
Last edited by JUKE179r; 06-24-2012 at 10:50 AM.
'07 MBP, Logic 9 Pro, Traktor Pro 2, Ableton Live 8, Roland MV-8000/TR-808/TR-909, Akai MPC2KXL/MPK-49, x0xb0x #911, Denon DN-MC6000/DN2500F, 3 Technics 1200's, 3000+ records
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks