If you are using the term loop as a colloquialism then it's your sequencer that does the looping rather than Kontakt.
With the greatest respect, I don't understand your point. Are you just into arguing semantics?
Why would anyone writing in a music creation forum use the term 'loop' as a colloquialism?
The concept of a loop is universally understood, even by laymen.
Kontakt plays a piece of audio, returns to the beginning of that piece of audio and plays it again.
Either by me telling kontakt to do it or by the sound file being preprogrammed to do so.
This piece of audio in this case is commonly referred to as a
loop.
Excuse my obnoxiousness here but in order to answer my original question I have to assume anyone answering would be familiar with the basic terms of reference.
If you're not, then it's pretty unlikely you'd have the adequate knowledge or experience to help me further. Of course I could be wrong.
Anyhoo, the situation is.
I make extensive use of Cubase, Logic audio, Addictive drums, ezplayer and Ezdrummer to create and master these loops, and I have been triggering them in a live performance situation whilst playing bass keyboard and piano and singing.
Now I'd like to improve the timing of the loops by having Kontakt instinctively play them sequentially instead of just interrupting each triggered loop so that the backing drums maintain their tightness.
Sort of what a drum machine like
the Alesis Sr18 does.
Preferably without the use of a DAW for reasons of simplicity and ease of use.
I know it can be done but I just don't know how.