Epsilon-144
Musician and Producer
Apple is better.
You're definitely my new hero
Can i redirect all those apple schmucks to you, that want to convince me that Apple really is better, I just don't realise it yet?
I've just given up on answering. I just refuse to talk to those people about any computer technology
lolsure thing, i will tell em straight up....of course whether or not people want to hear it is up to them though. The most important thing is helping those who want to make an informed decision rather than just have someone tell them what they want to hear......you know the type, there is always someone on here asking questions to receive an answer they have already decided upon......"should i buy those beats by dre headphones i have already decided i want? Please tell me that i am making the right decision or i will disregard your answer and buy them anyway, thanks".
when you ask a question like that you'll get a lot of "opinion", I've used both for music.
the one thing I can think of that a Mac can do (natively, no workarounds) that a PC can't
is "join" audio devices together.
So I could have two audio interfaces on the Mac , tell the preferences to bond them together and show them
as one device and then select that one device in the DAW , even though it's two devices.
(I used a PC for Music, went to a 5k mac and finally went back to a PC)
Dakoda.
I've made a multi output device, but that's only available on a mac? PC people can't do that? hm..I haven't look at a PC a long time.
Ok, basically using multiple audio outputs from a single audio interface connected directly to the PCI bus of the computer is better than using multiple audio outputs from multiple external audio interfaces which require additional system resources to run.....in other words routing your audio to a bunch of different audio interfaces is a shit idea to begin with and so touting some advantage in the way Apple handles that disadvantageous way of working is tantamount to turd polishing.nah, not rly. explain more.